Palmitoylethanolamide in the Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Q2 Medicine
Pain Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-10 DOI:10.1155/2017/1486010
Antonella Paladini, Giustino Varrassi, Giuseppe Bentivegna, Sandro Carletti, Alba Piroli, Stefano Coaccioli
{"title":"Palmitoylethanolamide in the Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.","authors":"Antonella Paladini,&nbsp;Giustino Varrassi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Bentivegna,&nbsp;Sandro Carletti,&nbsp;Alba Piroli,&nbsp;Stefano Coaccioli","doi":"10.1155/2017/1486010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This observational study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) (Normast®) administration, as add-on therapy for chronic pain, in the management of pain-resistant patients affected by failed back surgery syndrome. Methods A total of 35 patients were treated with tapentadol (TPD) and pregabalin (PGB). One month after the start of standard treatment, um-PEA was added for the next two months. Pain was evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the time of enrollment (T0) and after one (T1), two (T2), and three (T3) months. Results After the first month with TDP + PGB treatment only, VAS score decreased significantly from 5.7 ± 0.12 at the time of enrollment (T0) to 4.3 ± 0.11 (T1) (p < 0.0001); however, it failed to provide significant subjective improvement in pain symptoms. Addition of um-PEA led to a further and significant decrease in pain intensity, reaching VAS scores of 2.7 ± 0.09 (T2) and 1.7 ± 0.11 (T3, end of treatment) (p < 0.0001) without showing any side effects. Conclusions This observational study provides evidence, albeit preliminary, for the efficacy and safety of um-PEA (Normast) as part of a multimodal therapeutic regimen in the treatment of pain-resistant patients suffering from failed back surgery syndrome.","PeriodicalId":19786,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/1486010","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1486010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Introduction This observational study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) (Normast®) administration, as add-on therapy for chronic pain, in the management of pain-resistant patients affected by failed back surgery syndrome. Methods A total of 35 patients were treated with tapentadol (TPD) and pregabalin (PGB). One month after the start of standard treatment, um-PEA was added for the next two months. Pain was evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the time of enrollment (T0) and after one (T1), two (T2), and three (T3) months. Results After the first month with TDP + PGB treatment only, VAS score decreased significantly from 5.7 ± 0.12 at the time of enrollment (T0) to 4.3 ± 0.11 (T1) (p < 0.0001); however, it failed to provide significant subjective improvement in pain symptoms. Addition of um-PEA led to a further and significant decrease in pain intensity, reaching VAS scores of 2.7 ± 0.09 (T2) and 1.7 ± 0.11 (T3, end of treatment) (p < 0.0001) without showing any side effects. Conclusions This observational study provides evidence, albeit preliminary, for the efficacy and safety of um-PEA (Normast) as part of a multimodal therapeutic regimen in the treatment of pain-resistant patients suffering from failed back surgery syndrome.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

棕榈酰乙醇酰胺治疗背部手术失败综合征。
本观察性研究旨在评估超微化棕榈酰乙醇酰胺(um-PEA) (Normast®)作为慢性疼痛的附加治疗,在治疗背部手术失败综合征的疼痛耐受性患者中的疗效。方法:35例患者采用他他多(TPD)联合普瑞巴林(PGB)治疗。标准治疗开始一个月后,在接下来的两个月里添加um-PEA。在入组时(T0)和1个月(T1)、2个月(T2)和3个月(T3)后,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。结果:仅TDP + PGB治疗1个月后,VAS评分由入组时的5.7±0.12 (T0)降至4.3±0.11 (T1) (p < 0.0001);然而,它不能提供明显的主观改善疼痛症状。添加um-PEA可进一步显著降低疼痛强度,VAS评分分别为2.7±0.09 (T2)和1.7±0.11 (T3,治疗结束)(p < 0.0001),无任何副作用。结论:这项观察性研究为um-PEA (Normast)作为多模式治疗方案的一部分用于治疗背部手术失败综合征的疼痛耐受性患者的有效性和安全性提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research and Treatment
Pain Research and Treatment Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信