State-of-the-art and new options to assess T cell activation by skin sensitizers: Cosmetics Europe Workshop.

ALTEX Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-02 DOI:10.14573/altex.1709011
Erwin van Vliet, Jochen Kühnl, Carsten Goebel, Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier, Nathalie Alépée, Takao Ashikaga, Brunhilde Blömeke, Aurelia Del Bufalo, Magalie Cluzel, Emanuela Corsini, Nathalie Delrue, Bertrand Desprez, Nichola Gellatly, Christoph Giese, Laura Gribaldo, Sebastian Hoffmann, Martina Klaric, Bernard Maillere, Dean Naisbitt, Marc Pallardy, Marc Vocanson, Dirk Petersohn
{"title":"State-of-the-art and new options to assess T cell activation by skin sensitizers: Cosmetics Europe Workshop.","authors":"Erwin van Vliet,&nbsp;Jochen Kühnl,&nbsp;Carsten Goebel,&nbsp;Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier,&nbsp;Nathalie Alépée,&nbsp;Takao Ashikaga,&nbsp;Brunhilde Blömeke,&nbsp;Aurelia Del Bufalo,&nbsp;Magalie Cluzel,&nbsp;Emanuela Corsini,&nbsp;Nathalie Delrue,&nbsp;Bertrand Desprez,&nbsp;Nichola Gellatly,&nbsp;Christoph Giese,&nbsp;Laura Gribaldo,&nbsp;Sebastian Hoffmann,&nbsp;Martina Klaric,&nbsp;Bernard Maillere,&nbsp;Dean Naisbitt,&nbsp;Marc Pallardy,&nbsp;Marc Vocanson,&nbsp;Dirk Petersohn","doi":"10.14573/altex.1709011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Significant progress has been made in the development and validation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitization assessment. At present, three of the four key events of the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) are assessable by OECD-accepted in vitro methods. The fourth key event describes the immunological response in the draining lymph node where activated dendritic cells present major histocompatibility complex-bound chemically modified peptides to naive T cells, thereby priming the proliferation of antigen-specific T cells. Despite substantial efforts, modelling and assessing this adaptive immune response to sensitizers with in vitro T cell assays still represents a challenge. The Cosmetics Europe Skin Tolerance Task Force organized a workshop, bringing together academic researchers, method developers, industry representatives and regulatory stakeholders to review the scientific status of T cell-based assays, foster a mutual scientific understanding and conceive new options to assess T cell activation. Participants agreed that current T cell assays have come a long way in predicting immunogenicity, but that further investment and collaboration is required to simplify assays, optimize their sensitivity, better define human donor-to-donor variability and evaluate their value to predict sensitizer potency. Furthermore, the potential role of T cell assays in AOP-based testing strategies and subsequent safety assessment concepts for cosmetic ingredients was discussed. It was agreed that it is currently difficult to anticipate uses of T cell assay data for safety assessment and concluded that experience from case studies on real-life risk assessment scenarios is needed to further consider the usefulness of assessing the fourth AOP key event.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"179-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1709011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in the development and validation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitization assessment. At present, three of the four key events of the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) are assessable by OECD-accepted in vitro methods. The fourth key event describes the immunological response in the draining lymph node where activated dendritic cells present major histocompatibility complex-bound chemically modified peptides to naive T cells, thereby priming the proliferation of antigen-specific T cells. Despite substantial efforts, modelling and assessing this adaptive immune response to sensitizers with in vitro T cell assays still represents a challenge. The Cosmetics Europe Skin Tolerance Task Force organized a workshop, bringing together academic researchers, method developers, industry representatives and regulatory stakeholders to review the scientific status of T cell-based assays, foster a mutual scientific understanding and conceive new options to assess T cell activation. Participants agreed that current T cell assays have come a long way in predicting immunogenicity, but that further investment and collaboration is required to simplify assays, optimize their sensitivity, better define human donor-to-donor variability and evaluate their value to predict sensitizer potency. Furthermore, the potential role of T cell assays in AOP-based testing strategies and subsequent safety assessment concepts for cosmetic ingredients was discussed. It was agreed that it is currently difficult to anticipate uses of T cell assay data for safety assessment and concluded that experience from case studies on real-life risk assessment scenarios is needed to further consider the usefulness of assessing the fourth AOP key event.

最先进的和新的选择评估T细胞活化的皮肤致敏剂:化妆品欧洲研讨会。
在皮肤致敏性评估的非动物试验方法的开发和验证方面取得了重大进展。目前,不良结果途径(AOP)的四个关键事件中的三个可以通过经合组织接受的体外方法进行评估。第四个关键事件描述了引流淋巴结中的免疫反应,其中活化的树突状细胞向幼稚T细胞呈现主要的组织相容性复合物结合的化学修饰肽,从而引发抗原特异性T细胞的增殖。尽管付出了巨大的努力,但用体外T细胞试验模拟和评估这种对增敏剂的适应性免疫反应仍然是一个挑战。化妆品欧洲皮肤耐受工作组组织了一次研讨会,汇集了学术研究人员、方法开发人员、行业代表和监管利益相关者,回顾了基于T细胞的检测的科学现状,促进了相互的科学理解,并构思了评估T细胞激活的新选择。与会者一致认为,目前的T细胞测定法在预测免疫原性方面已经取得了长足的进步,但是需要进一步的投资和合作来简化测定法,优化其敏感性,更好地定义人类供体与供体之间的差异,并评估其预测致敏剂效力的价值。此外,本文还讨论了T细胞检测在基于aop的检测策略和后续化妆品成分安全评估概念中的潜在作用。会议一致认为,目前很难预测使用T细胞分析数据进行安全性评估,并得出结论,需要从现实风险评估情景的案例研究中获得经验,以进一步考虑评估AOP第四个关键事件的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信