Form and function in the Lower Palaeolithic: history, progress, and continued relevance.

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Journal of Anthropological Sciences Pub Date : 2017-12-30 Epub Date: 2017-07-31 DOI:10.4436/JASS.95017
Alastair Key, Lycett Stephen
{"title":"Form and function in the Lower Palaeolithic: history, progress, and continued relevance.","authors":"Alastair Key,&nbsp;Lycett Stephen","doi":"10.4436/JASS.95017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percussively flaked stone artefacts constitute a major source of evidence relating to hominin behavioural strategies and are, essentially, a product or byproduct of a past individual's decision to create a tool with respect to some broader goal. Moreover, it has long been noted that both differences and recurrent regularities exist within and between Palaeolithic stone artefact forms. Accordingly, archaeologists have frequently drawn links between form and functionality, with functional objectives and performance often being regarded consequential to a stone tool's morphological properties. Despite these factors, extensive reviews of the related concepts of form and function with respect to the Lower Palaeolithic remain surprisingly sparse. We attempt to redress this issue. First we stress the historical place of form-function concepts, and their role in establishing basic ideas that echo to this day. We then highlight methodological and conceptual progress in determining artefactual function in more recent years. Thereafter, we evaluate four specific issues that are of direct consequence for evaluating the ongoing relevance of form-function concepts, especially with respect to their relevance for understanding human evolution more generally. Our discussion highlights specifically how recent developments have been able to build on a long historical legacy, and demonstrate that direct, indirect, experimental, and evolutionary perspectives intersect in crucial ways, with each providing specific but essential insights for ongoing questions. We conclude by emphasising that our understanding of these issues and their interaction, has been, and will be, essential to accurately interpret the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record, tool-form related behaviours of Lower Palaeolithic hominins, and their consequences for (and relationship to) wider questions of human evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"67-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.95017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Percussively flaked stone artefacts constitute a major source of evidence relating to hominin behavioural strategies and are, essentially, a product or byproduct of a past individual's decision to create a tool with respect to some broader goal. Moreover, it has long been noted that both differences and recurrent regularities exist within and between Palaeolithic stone artefact forms. Accordingly, archaeologists have frequently drawn links between form and functionality, with functional objectives and performance often being regarded consequential to a stone tool's morphological properties. Despite these factors, extensive reviews of the related concepts of form and function with respect to the Lower Palaeolithic remain surprisingly sparse. We attempt to redress this issue. First we stress the historical place of form-function concepts, and their role in establishing basic ideas that echo to this day. We then highlight methodological and conceptual progress in determining artefactual function in more recent years. Thereafter, we evaluate four specific issues that are of direct consequence for evaluating the ongoing relevance of form-function concepts, especially with respect to their relevance for understanding human evolution more generally. Our discussion highlights specifically how recent developments have been able to build on a long historical legacy, and demonstrate that direct, indirect, experimental, and evolutionary perspectives intersect in crucial ways, with each providing specific but essential insights for ongoing questions. We conclude by emphasising that our understanding of these issues and their interaction, has been, and will be, essential to accurately interpret the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record, tool-form related behaviours of Lower Palaeolithic hominins, and their consequences for (and relationship to) wider questions of human evolution.

旧石器时代晚期的形式和功能:历史、进展和持续的相关性。
敲击式剥落的石质人工制品是人类行为策略的主要证据来源,从本质上讲,是过去的个体为了实现更广泛的目标而创造工具的决定的产物或副产品。此外,人们早就注意到,旧石器时代的石头人工制品形式内部和之间存在差异和循环规律。因此,考古学家经常在形式和功能之间建立联系,功能目标和性能通常被认为是石器形态特性的结果。尽管有这些因素,关于旧石器时代晚期的形式和功能的相关概念的广泛评论仍然令人惊讶地稀少。我们试图解决这个问题。首先,我们强调形式-功能概念的历史地位,以及它们在建立至今仍然存在的基本思想方面所起的作用。然后,我们强调了近年来在确定人工功能方面的方法和概念进展。此后,我们评估了四个具体问题,这些问题对评估形式-功能概念的持续相关性具有直接影响,特别是与它们对更普遍地理解人类进化的相关性有关。我们的讨论特别强调了最近的发展如何能够建立在悠久的历史遗产之上,并证明了直接、间接、实验和进化的观点以至关重要的方式相交,每种观点都为正在进行的问题提供了具体但重要的见解。最后,我们强调,我们对这些问题及其相互作用的理解,对于准确解释下旧石器时代的考古记录,下旧石器时代人类的工具形式相关行为,以及它们对人类进化更广泛问题的影响(和关系)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anthropological Sciences
Journal of Anthropological Sciences Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anthropological Sciences (JASs) publishes reviews, original papers and notes concerning human paleontology, prehistory, biology and genetics of extinct and extant populations. Particular attention is paid to the significance of Anthropology as an interdisciplinary field of research. Only papers in English can be considered for publication. All contributions are revised by the editorial board together with the panel of referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信