[Efficacy of oral hyposensitization treatment in house dust mite allergy (author's transl)].

IF 0.3
R Urbanek, R Gehl
{"title":"[Efficacy of oral hyposensitization treatment in house dust mite allergy (author's transl)].","authors":"R Urbanek,&nbsp;R Gehl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>32 children with perennial asthma and/or rhinitis due to house dust mite (HDM) allergy have been hyposensitized orally for a period of 42 weeks. The sensitization against HDM was confirmed by skin testing, RAST determinations and nasal provocation tests before and after treatment. The trial was double-blind, with 17 patients receiving the HDM extract and 15 receiving placebo. Patients returned for assessment at 6, 18, 30, and 42 weeks, nasal airways resistance testing, lung function tests (FVC), FEV1, PEF) and clinical evaluations were performed. The results of the subjective and objective assessments failed to demonstrate any superiority of oral hyposensitization with house dust mite extract compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":520712,"journal":{"name":"Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":"150-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"1982-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

32 children with perennial asthma and/or rhinitis due to house dust mite (HDM) allergy have been hyposensitized orally for a period of 42 weeks. The sensitization against HDM was confirmed by skin testing, RAST determinations and nasal provocation tests before and after treatment. The trial was double-blind, with 17 patients receiving the HDM extract and 15 receiving placebo. Patients returned for assessment at 6, 18, 30, and 42 weeks, nasal airways resistance testing, lung function tests (FVC), FEV1, PEF) and clinical evaluations were performed. The results of the subjective and objective assessments failed to demonstrate any superiority of oral hyposensitization with house dust mite extract compared to placebo.

[口服减敏治疗屋尘螨过敏的疗效观察[作者简介]。
对32例因屋尘螨(HDM)过敏而患有常年性哮喘和/或鼻炎的儿童进行了42周的口服减敏治疗。治疗前后通过皮肤试验、RAST测定和鼻腔激发试验证实对HDM的致敏作用。该试验是双盲的,17名患者接受HDM提取物,15名患者接受安慰剂。患者于6周、18周、30周和42周返回进行评估,进行鼻气道阻力测试、肺功能测试(FVC)、FEV1、PEF)和临床评估。主观和客观评估的结果未能证明与安慰剂相比,室内尘螨提取物口服减敏的任何优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书