Job satisfaction criteria to improve general practitioner recruitment: a Delphi consensus.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bernard Le Floch, Hilde Bastiaens, Jean-Yves Le Reste, Patrice Nabbe, Perrine Le Floch, Mael Cam, Tristan Montier, Lieve Peremans
{"title":"Job satisfaction criteria to improve general practitioner recruitment: a Delphi consensus.","authors":"Bernard Le Floch, Hilde Bastiaens, Jean-Yves Le Reste, Patrice Nabbe, Perrine Le Floch, Mael Cam, Tristan Montier, Lieve Peremans","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical general practitioner (GP) workforce is decreasing. Many studies have analysed the negative aspects of the profession but, few examine the positive aspects and job satisfaction. A European collaborative group including 8 participating countries recently conducted a qualitative study to analyse the positive factors and found 31 job satisfaction factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine which of these 31 factors are important and applicable to future policies to improve family medicine attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in France.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Delphi consensus method was chosen. Two Delphi rounds were conducted in March-April 2017 and retained satisfaction factors with at least 70% of scores ≥7. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank these retained factors. Participants assigned 5 points to the factor they considered most important, 3 points to the second, and 1 point to the third. Factors receiving at least 5% (10 points) of the total points (198 points) were included in the final list. The expert panel included GPs and non-GPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine experts began the procedure and 22 completed it. Thirty factors were retained after the 2 Delphi rounds. The NGT resulted in 8 factors: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of the patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 8 job satisfaction factors are important to consider and apply to future policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical general practitioner (GP) workforce is decreasing. Many studies have analysed the negative aspects of the profession but, few examine the positive aspects and job satisfaction. A European collaborative group including 8 participating countries recently conducted a qualitative study to analyse the positive factors and found 31 job satisfaction factors.

Objectives: To determine which of these 31 factors are important and applicable to future policies to improve family medicine attractiveness, recruitment, and retention in France.

Method: The Delphi consensus method was chosen. Two Delphi rounds were conducted in March-April 2017 and retained satisfaction factors with at least 70% of scores ≥7. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to rank these retained factors. Participants assigned 5 points to the factor they considered most important, 3 points to the second, and 1 point to the third. Factors receiving at least 5% (10 points) of the total points (198 points) were included in the final list. The expert panel included GPs and non-GPs.

Results: Twenty-nine experts began the procedure and 22 completed it. Thirty factors were retained after the 2 Delphi rounds. The NGT resulted in 8 factors: (i) Engage in family medicine to take care of the patients; (ii) Care coordination, patient advocacy; (iii) Flexibility in work; (iv) Trying to be a person-centred doctor; (v) Involvement in healthcare organization; (vi) Benefiting from a well-managed practice; (vii) Being a teacher, a trainer; (viii) Efficient professional collaboration.

Conclusion: These 8 job satisfaction factors are important to consider and apply to future policy development.

改善全科医生招聘的工作满意度标准:德尔菲共识。
背景:临床全科医生(GP)队伍正在减少。许多研究分析了这一职业的消极方面,但很少研究其积极方面和工作满意度。最近,一个包括 8 个参与国在内的欧洲合作小组开展了一项定性研究,对积极因素进行了分析,发现了 31 个工作满意度因素:确定这 31 个因素中哪些因素是重要的,并适用于未来的政策,以提高法国家庭医学的吸引力、招聘和留住人才:方法:选择德尔菲共识法。2017年3月至4月进行了两轮德尔菲讨论,保留了至少70%得分≥7分的满意度因素。采用名义小组技术(NGT)对这些保留的因素进行排序。参与者为他们认为最重要的因素分配 5 分,为第二因素分配 3 分,为第三因素分配 1 分。获得总分(198 分)至少 5%(10 分)的因素被列入最终名单。专家小组成员包括全科医生和非全科医生:结果:29 位专家开始了这一程序,22 位专家完成了这一程序。经过两轮德尔菲讨论后,保留了 30 个因素。NGT 得出了 8 个因素:(i) 从事家庭医疗,照顾病人;(ii) 护理协调,倡导病人权益;(iii) 工作的灵活性;(iv) 努力成为以人为本的医生;(v) 参与医疗组织;(vi) 受益于管理良好的实践;(vii) 成为教师、培训师;(viii) 高效的专业合作:这 8 个工作满意度因素是未来政策制定中需要考虑和应用的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信