Considerations for Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Biometric Monitoring Technologies in Clinical Trials.

Q1 Computer Science
Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2022-08-29 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000525897
Bohdana Ratitch, Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez, Abhishek Dabral, Adriano Fontanari, Julio Vega, Francesco Onorati, Benjamin Vandendriessche, Stuart Morton, Yasaman Damestani
{"title":"Considerations for Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Biometric Monitoring Technologies in Clinical Trials.","authors":"Bohdana Ratitch,&nbsp;Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez,&nbsp;Abhishek Dabral,&nbsp;Adriano Fontanari,&nbsp;Julio Vega,&nbsp;Francesco Onorati,&nbsp;Benjamin Vandendriessche,&nbsp;Stuart Morton,&nbsp;Yasaman Damestani","doi":"10.1159/000525897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The proliferation and increasing maturity of biometric monitoring technologies allow clinical investigators to measure the health status of trial participants in a more holistic manner, especially outside of traditional clinical settings. This includes capturing meaningful aspects of health in daily living and a more granular and objective manner compared to traditional tools in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Within multidisciplinary teams, statisticians and data scientists are increasingly involved in clinical trials that incorporate digital clinical measures. They are called upon to provide input into trial planning, generation of evidence on the clinical validity of novel clinical measures, and evaluation of the adequacy of existing evidence. Analysis objectives related to demonstrating clinical validity of novel clinical measures differ from typical objectives related to demonstrating safety and efficacy of therapeutic interventions using established measures which statisticians are most familiar with.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This paper discusses key considerations for generating evidence for clinical validity through the lens of the type and intended use of a clinical measure. This paper also briefly discusses the regulatory pathways through which clinical validity evidence may be reviewed and highlights challenges that investigators may encounter while dealing with data from biometric monitoring technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"6 3","pages":"83-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/9e/dib-0006-0083.PMC9716191.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The proliferation and increasing maturity of biometric monitoring technologies allow clinical investigators to measure the health status of trial participants in a more holistic manner, especially outside of traditional clinical settings. This includes capturing meaningful aspects of health in daily living and a more granular and objective manner compared to traditional tools in clinical settings.

Summary: Within multidisciplinary teams, statisticians and data scientists are increasingly involved in clinical trials that incorporate digital clinical measures. They are called upon to provide input into trial planning, generation of evidence on the clinical validity of novel clinical measures, and evaluation of the adequacy of existing evidence. Analysis objectives related to demonstrating clinical validity of novel clinical measures differ from typical objectives related to demonstrating safety and efficacy of therapeutic interventions using established measures which statisticians are most familiar with.

Key messages: This paper discusses key considerations for generating evidence for clinical validity through the lens of the type and intended use of a clinical measure. This paper also briefly discusses the regulatory pathways through which clinical validity evidence may be reviewed and highlights challenges that investigators may encounter while dealing with data from biometric monitoring technologies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床试验中生物特征监测技术数据分析和解释的考虑。
背景:生物识别监测技术的发展和日益成熟使临床研究人员能够以更全面的方式测量试验参与者的健康状况,特别是在传统临床环境之外。这包括在日常生活中捕捉健康的有意义的方面,以及与临床环境中的传统工具相比,更细致和客观的方式。摘要:在多学科团队中,统计学家和数据科学家越来越多地参与到包含数字临床测量的临床试验中。他们被要求为试验计划、新临床措施的临床有效性证据的产生以及现有证据的充分性评估提供投入。与证明新型临床措施的临床有效性相关的分析目标不同于与使用统计学家最熟悉的既定措施证明治疗干预措施的安全性和有效性相关的典型目标。关键信息:本文通过临床测量的类型和预期用途的镜头讨论了产生临床有效性证据的关键考虑因素。本文还简要讨论了临床有效性证据可能被审查的监管途径,并强调了研究人员在处理生物识别监测技术数据时可能遇到的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信