Pathophysiology of writer's cramp: an exploratory study on task-specificity and non-motor symptoms using an extended fine-motor testing battery.

Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2017-08-08 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40734-017-0060-4
Ali Amouzandeh, Michael Grossbach, Joachim Hermsdörfer, Eckart Altenmüller
{"title":"Pathophysiology of writer's cramp: an exploratory study on task-specificity and non-motor symptoms using an extended fine-motor testing battery.","authors":"Ali Amouzandeh, Michael Grossbach, Joachim Hermsdörfer, Eckart Altenmüller","doi":"10.1186/s40734-017-0060-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Writer's cramp (WC) is a task-specific focal dystonia which manifests itself as abnormal postures interfering with motor performance. As the spread of motor symptoms remains controversial and non-motor symptoms are widely discussed, in this exploratory study, we explore the pathophysiology of WC, focusing on task-specificity and the psychological profiles of WC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 14 right-handed WC patients and matched controls, we assessed motor control by applying motor performance tests (Vienna Test Series), as well as using writing analysis and grip-force measurements. Moreover, detailed psychological factors were assessed. Classification trees were used to distinguish patients from controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total duration of writing and the vertical writing frequency of the pen are the most important variables to split the data set successfully into patients and controls. No other variables concerning motor performance tests, grip-force measurements or psychological factors correctly separated patients and controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only variables from the writing tasks successfully separated patients and controls, indicating a strong task-specificity of WC in our patient group. Future research should be performed with larger samples of untreated WC patients in early stages of impairment, without any secondary motor disturbances, to verify our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","volume":"4 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5547537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-017-0060-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Writer's cramp (WC) is a task-specific focal dystonia which manifests itself as abnormal postures interfering with motor performance. As the spread of motor symptoms remains controversial and non-motor symptoms are widely discussed, in this exploratory study, we explore the pathophysiology of WC, focusing on task-specificity and the psychological profiles of WC patients.

Methods: In 14 right-handed WC patients and matched controls, we assessed motor control by applying motor performance tests (Vienna Test Series), as well as using writing analysis and grip-force measurements. Moreover, detailed psychological factors were assessed. Classification trees were used to distinguish patients from controls.

Results: The total duration of writing and the vertical writing frequency of the pen are the most important variables to split the data set successfully into patients and controls. No other variables concerning motor performance tests, grip-force measurements or psychological factors correctly separated patients and controls.

Conclusions: Only variables from the writing tasks successfully separated patients and controls, indicating a strong task-specificity of WC in our patient group. Future research should be performed with larger samples of untreated WC patients in early stages of impairment, without any secondary motor disturbances, to verify our findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

作家痉挛的病理生理学:使用扩展精细运动测试电池对任务特异性和非运动症状进行探索性研究。
背景:作家痉挛(WC)是一种任务特异性局灶性肌张力障碍,表现为干扰运动表现的异常姿势。由于运动症状的传播仍存在争议,而非运动症状则被广泛讨论,因此在这项探索性研究中,我们探讨了 WC 的病理生理学,重点是任务特异性和 WC 患者的心理特征:方法:我们对 14 名右撇子 WC 患者和匹配的对照组进行了研究,通过运动表现测试(维也纳测试系列)、书写分析和握力测量来评估运动控制能力。此外,我们还对详细的心理因素进行了评估。我们使用分类树来区分患者和对照组:结果:书写总持续时间和笔的垂直书写频率是将数据集成功分为患者和对照组的最重要变量。与运动表现测试、握力测量或心理因素有关的其他变量都不能正确区分患者和对照组:结论:只有书写任务中的变量能成功区分患者和对照组,这表明在我们的患者群体中,WC 具有很强的任务特异性。未来的研究应该在更大的样本中进行,以验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信