{"title":"A diagnostic survey of patients referred for chromosome analysis.","authors":"G Kosztolányi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Out of 692 patients referred for chromosome analysis because of abnormal clinical features, 199 (28.7%) had chromosomal abnormalities. In addition, assessment of the abnormal phenotypic features and the data of other (laboratory, X-ray, etc.) examinations revealed 25 (3.6%) single gene disorders, 25 (3.6%) recognizable syndromes or associations of unknown aetiology, and in 4 cases (0.6%) environmental agents were established as possible aetiological factors. Altogether, of the 692 cases, 253 (36.5%) had a definitive diagnosis, while the remainder 439 were undiagnosed. These results suggest that (i) chromosome analysis is worthwhile if the patient has significant clinical abnormalities, and (ii) a request for chromosome analysis should be viewed as one step in syndrome identification, so that a normal karyotype should stimulate the physician to further efforts to establish a diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":75405,"journal":{"name":"Acta paediatrica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","volume":" ","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta paediatrica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Out of 692 patients referred for chromosome analysis because of abnormal clinical features, 199 (28.7%) had chromosomal abnormalities. In addition, assessment of the abnormal phenotypic features and the data of other (laboratory, X-ray, etc.) examinations revealed 25 (3.6%) single gene disorders, 25 (3.6%) recognizable syndromes or associations of unknown aetiology, and in 4 cases (0.6%) environmental agents were established as possible aetiological factors. Altogether, of the 692 cases, 253 (36.5%) had a definitive diagnosis, while the remainder 439 were undiagnosed. These results suggest that (i) chromosome analysis is worthwhile if the patient has significant clinical abnormalities, and (ii) a request for chromosome analysis should be viewed as one step in syndrome identification, so that a normal karyotype should stimulate the physician to further efforts to establish a diagnosis.