Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers to Predict Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives.

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-07-19 DOI:10.1155/2017/6198530
Patricia K Coyle
{"title":"Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers to Predict Treatment Response in Multiple Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Patricia K Coyle","doi":"10.1155/2017/6198530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have significantly advanced the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), decreasing the frequency of relapses, disability, and magnetic resonance imaging lesion formation. However, patients' responses to and tolerability of DMTs vary considerably, creating an unmet need for biomarkers to identify likely responders and/or those who may have treatment-limiting adverse reactions. Most studies in MS have focused on the identification of pharmacogenetic markers, using either the candidate-gene approach, which requires prior knowledge of the genetic marker and its role in the target disease, or genome-wide association, which examines multiple genetic variants, typically single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Both approaches have implicated numerous alleles and SNPs in response to selected MS DMTs. None have been validated for use in clinical practice. This review covers pharmacogenetic markers in clinical practice in other diseases and then reviews the current status of MS DMT markers (interferon <i>β</i>, glatiramer acetate, and mitoxantrone). For a complex disease such as MS, multiple biomarkers may need to be evaluated simultaneously to identify potential responders. Efforts to identify relevant biomarkers are underway and will need to be expanded to all MS DMTs. These will require extensive validation in large patient groups before they can be used in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6198530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have significantly advanced the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), decreasing the frequency of relapses, disability, and magnetic resonance imaging lesion formation. However, patients' responses to and tolerability of DMTs vary considerably, creating an unmet need for biomarkers to identify likely responders and/or those who may have treatment-limiting adverse reactions. Most studies in MS have focused on the identification of pharmacogenetic markers, using either the candidate-gene approach, which requires prior knowledge of the genetic marker and its role in the target disease, or genome-wide association, which examines multiple genetic variants, typically single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Both approaches have implicated numerous alleles and SNPs in response to selected MS DMTs. None have been validated for use in clinical practice. This review covers pharmacogenetic markers in clinical practice in other diseases and then reviews the current status of MS DMT markers (interferon β, glatiramer acetate, and mitoxantrone). For a complex disease such as MS, multiple biomarkers may need to be evaluated simultaneously to identify potential responders. Efforts to identify relevant biomarkers are underway and will need to be expanded to all MS DMTs. These will require extensive validation in large patient groups before they can be used in clinical practice.

预测多发性硬化症治疗反应的药物基因生物标志物:当前和未来展望。
疾病修饰疗法(DMTs)大大推进了复发性多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗,降低了复发频率、残疾程度和磁共振成像病灶的形成。然而,患者对 DMTs 的反应和耐受性差异很大,因此对生物标记物的需求尚未得到满足,而生物标记物可用于识别可能的反应者和/或可能出现治疗限制性不良反应的患者。对多发性硬化症的大多数研究都集中在药物遗传标记物的鉴定上,这些研究要么采用候选基因方法(需要事先了解遗传标记物及其在目标疾病中的作用),要么采用全基因组关联方法(检查多个遗传变异,通常是单核苷酸多态性(SNP))。这两种方法都发现了许多等位基因和 SNPs 与所选 MS DMTs 的反应有关。但没有一种方法经过验证可用于临床实践。本综述介绍了其他疾病临床实践中的药物基因标记物,然后回顾了多发性硬化症 DMT 标记物(β 干扰素、醋酸格拉替雷和米托蒽醌)的现状。对于像多发性硬化症这样的复杂疾病,可能需要同时评估多种生物标志物,以确定潜在的应答者。确定相关生物标志物的工作正在进行中,并需要扩展到所有多发性硬化症 DMTs。这些生物标志物需要在大型患者群体中进行广泛验证,然后才能用于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信