Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities.

Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2017-09-30 eCollection Date: 2017-07-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2017.8303
Thomas Starch-Jensen, Janek Dalsgaard Jensen
{"title":"Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities.","authors":"Thomas Starch-Jensen,&nbsp;Janek Dalsgaard Jensen","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2017.8303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the present study is to present the current best evidence for enhancement of the vertical alveolar bone height and oral rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with dental implants and propose some evidence-based treatment guidelines.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of the English literature including MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search was conducted assessing the final implant treatment outcome after oral rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with dental implants. No year of publication restriction was applied. The clinical, radiological and histomorphometric outcome as well as complications are presented after maxillary sinus floor augmentation applying the lateral window technique with a graft material, maxillary sinus membrane elevation without a graft material and osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without the use of a graft material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High implant survival rate and new bone formation was reported with the three treatment modalities. Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was the most common complication, but the final implant treatment outcome was not influenced by a Schneiderian membrane perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The different surgical techniques for enhancement of the vertical alveolar bone height in the posterior part of the maxilla revealed high implant survival with a low incidence of complications. However, the indication for the various surgical techniques is not strictly equivalent and the treatment choice should be based on a careful evaluation of the individual case. Moreover, further high evidence-based and well reported long-term studies are needed before one treatment modality might be considered superior to another.</p>","PeriodicalId":230885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","volume":"8 3","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5037/jomr.2017.8303","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the present study is to present the current best evidence for enhancement of the vertical alveolar bone height and oral rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with dental implants and propose some evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Material and methods: A comprehensive review of the English literature including MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search was conducted assessing the final implant treatment outcome after oral rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with dental implants. No year of publication restriction was applied. The clinical, radiological and histomorphometric outcome as well as complications are presented after maxillary sinus floor augmentation applying the lateral window technique with a graft material, maxillary sinus membrane elevation without a graft material and osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without the use of a graft material.

Results: High implant survival rate and new bone formation was reported with the three treatment modalities. Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was the most common complication, but the final implant treatment outcome was not influenced by a Schneiderian membrane perforation.

Conclusions: The different surgical techniques for enhancement of the vertical alveolar bone height in the posterior part of the maxilla revealed high implant survival with a low incidence of complications. However, the indication for the various surgical techniques is not strictly equivalent and the treatment choice should be based on a careful evaluation of the individual case. Moreover, further high evidence-based and well reported long-term studies are needed before one treatment modality might be considered superior to another.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

上颌窦底增强术:对选定治疗方式的回顾。
目的:本研究的目的是提供目前最好的证据,提高垂直牙槽骨高度和口腔康复萎缩的后上颌种植牙,并提出一些循证治疗指南。材料与方法:综合查阅MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane Library等英文文献,评估萎缩性后上颌采用种植体进行口腔康复后的最终种植治疗效果。没有适用出版年份限制。临床、放射学和组织形态学结果以及并发症介绍了应用带移植物材料的侧窗技术进行上颌窦底增强、不带移植物材料的上颌窦膜提升和使用或不使用移植物材料的骨切开术介导的窦底提升。结果:三种治疗方式均有较高的种植体成活率和新骨形成。施耐德膜穿孔是最常见的并发症,但最终种植体治疗结果不受施耐德膜穿孔的影响。结论:采用不同术式提高上颌骨后段牙槽骨垂直高度,种植体成活率高,并发症发生率低。然而,各种手术技术的适应症并不完全相同,治疗的选择应基于对个体病例的仔细评估。此外,在一种治疗方式被认为优于另一种治疗方式之前,需要进一步的高证据和充分报道的长期研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信