Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A systematic review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1177/15910199221143418
Sepideh Paybast, Reza Mohamadian, Ali Emami, Melika Jameie, Fereshteh Shahrab, Farideh Zamani, Ehsan Sharifipour
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A systematic review.","authors":"Sepideh Paybast, Reza Mohamadian, Ali Emami, Melika Jameie, Fereshteh Shahrab, Farideh Zamani, Ehsan Sharifipour","doi":"10.1177/15910199221143418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon but fatal cause of stroke worldwide. Endovascular treatments could be life-saving in patients who don't treat with anticoagulants as a mainstay of treatment. Currently, there is no consensus considering the safety, efficacy, and also selected approaches of endovascular intervention for these patients. This systematic review evaluates the literature on endovascular thrombolysis (EVT) in CVST patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed and Scopus databases between 2010 and 2021, with additional sources identified through cross-referencing. The primary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of EVT in CVST, including catheter-related and non-catheter-related complications, clinical outcomes, and radiological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies comprising 339 patients were included. Most of the patients presented with headaches (86.72%) and/or focal neurologic deficits (45.43%) (modified Rankin Scale of 5 in 55.88%). Acquired coagulopathy and/or consuming estrogen/progesterone medication were the most frequent predisposing factors (45.59%). At presentation, 68.84% had multi-sinus involvement, and 28.90% had venous infarcts and/or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The overall complication rate was 10.3%, with a 2.94%, 1.47%, and 1.17% rate of ICH, herniation, and intracranial edema, respectively. The complete and partial postoperative radiographic resolution was reported in 89.97% of patients, increasing to 95.21% during the follow-up. Additionally, 72.22% of patients had no or mild neurologic deficit at discharge, rising to 91.18% at the last follow-up. The overall mortality rate was 7.07%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVT can be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with refractory CVST or contraindications to systemic anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221143418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon but fatal cause of stroke worldwide. Endovascular treatments could be life-saving in patients who don't treat with anticoagulants as a mainstay of treatment. Currently, there is no consensus considering the safety, efficacy, and also selected approaches of endovascular intervention for these patients. This systematic review evaluates the literature on endovascular thrombolysis (EVT) in CVST patients.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed and Scopus databases between 2010 and 2021, with additional sources identified through cross-referencing. The primary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of EVT in CVST, including catheter-related and non-catheter-related complications, clinical outcomes, and radiological outcomes.

Results: A total of 10 studies comprising 339 patients were included. Most of the patients presented with headaches (86.72%) and/or focal neurologic deficits (45.43%) (modified Rankin Scale of 5 in 55.88%). Acquired coagulopathy and/or consuming estrogen/progesterone medication were the most frequent predisposing factors (45.59%). At presentation, 68.84% had multi-sinus involvement, and 28.90% had venous infarcts and/or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The overall complication rate was 10.3%, with a 2.94%, 1.47%, and 1.17% rate of ICH, herniation, and intracranial edema, respectively. The complete and partial postoperative radiographic resolution was reported in 89.97% of patients, increasing to 95.21% during the follow-up. Additionally, 72.22% of patients had no or mild neurologic deficit at discharge, rising to 91.18% at the last follow-up. The overall mortality rate was 7.07%.

Conclusions: EVT can be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with refractory CVST or contraindications to systemic anticoagulation.

急性脑静脉窦血栓形成患者血管内溶栓的安全性和有效性:系统综述。
简介脑静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)是全球范围内一种不常见但却致命的脑卒中病因。对于不以抗凝药物为主要治疗手段的患者,血管内治疗可挽救他们的生命。目前,对这些患者进行血管内介入治疗的安全性、有效性和所选方法尚未达成共识。本系统性综述评估了有关 CVST 患者血管内溶栓(EVT)的文献:在 2010 年至 2021 年期间通过 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库进行了全面检索,并通过交叉引用确定了其他来源。主要结果是CVST中EVT的安全性和有效性,包括导管相关和非导管相关并发症、临床结果和放射学结果:结果:共纳入了 10 项研究,包括 339 名患者。大多数患者表现为头痛(86.72%)和/或局灶性神经功能缺损(45.43%)(55.88%的患者改良Rankin量表为5级)。后天性凝血功能障碍和/或服用雌激素/孕激素药物是最常见的诱发因素(45.59%)。发病时,68.84%的患者有多窦受累,28.90%的患者有静脉梗塞和/或颅内出血(ICH)。总并发症发生率为 10.3%,其中 ICH、疝和颅内水肿的发生率分别为 2.94%、1.47% 和 1.17%。据报告,89.97%的患者术后影像学检查完全或部分消失,随访期间这一比例增至 95.21%。此外,72.22%的患者在出院时没有或有轻微的神经功能缺损,在最后一次随访时这一比例上升到91.18%。总死亡率为7.07%:对于难治性 CVST 或有全身抗凝禁忌症的患者来说,EVT 是一种有效而安全的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信