Incorrect Diagnosis of Type A Aortic Dissection Attributed to Motion Artifact During Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Case Report.

Jeremy M Bennett, Bantayehu Sileshi
{"title":"Incorrect Diagnosis of Type A Aortic Dissection Attributed to Motion Artifact During Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Case Report.","authors":"Jeremy M Bennett,&nbsp;Bantayehu Sileshi","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000000582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of aortic dissection is important to reduce mortality, with surgical management representing standard treatment. Current methods of diagnosing type A aortic dissection include computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging, catheter-based arteriography, and transesophageal echocardiography. While each method has merits, there exists potential for false-positive findings. We present a case of a patient who was diagnosed with type A aortic dissection by CTA, but was found to not have an aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography under general anesthesia, preventing an unnecessary sternotomy. The echocardiographic findings suggested CTA artifact.</p>","PeriodicalId":6824,"journal":{"name":"A&A Case Reports ","volume":"9 9","pages":"254-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000582","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A Case Reports ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Early diagnosis of aortic dissection is important to reduce mortality, with surgical management representing standard treatment. Current methods of diagnosing type A aortic dissection include computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging, catheter-based arteriography, and transesophageal echocardiography. While each method has merits, there exists potential for false-positive findings. We present a case of a patient who was diagnosed with type A aortic dissection by CTA, but was found to not have an aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography under general anesthesia, preventing an unnecessary sternotomy. The echocardiographic findings suggested CTA artifact.

计算机断层血管造影中运动伪影导致的A型主动脉夹层错误诊断1例。
主动脉夹层的早期诊断对降低死亡率很重要,手术治疗是标准的治疗方法。目前诊断A型主动脉夹层的方法包括计算机断层血管造影(CTA)、磁共振成像、导管动脉造影和经食管超声心动图。虽然每种方法都有优点,但存在假阳性结果的可能性。我们报告一个病例,患者经CTA诊断为a型主动脉夹层,但在全身麻醉下经食管超声心动图发现没有主动脉夹层,从而避免了不必要的胸骨切开术。超声心动图提示CTA伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信