Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.

Advances in Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1155/2017/9780317
Akhil Kher, Sandra Johnson, Robert Griffith
{"title":"Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.","authors":"Akhil Kher, Sandra Johnson, Robert Griffith","doi":"10.1155/2017/9780317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online health information is being used more ubiquitously by the general population. However, this information typically favors only a small percentage of readers, which can result in suboptimal medical outcomes for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The readability of online patient education materials regarding the topic of congestive heart failure was assessed through six readability assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search phrase \"congestive heart failure\" was employed into the search engine Google. Out of the first 100 websites, only 70 were included attending to compliance with selection and exclusion criteria. These were then assessed through six readability assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 5 out of 70 websites were within the limits of the recommended sixth-grade readability level. The mean readability scores were as follows: the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (9.79), Gunning-Fog Score (11.95), Coleman-Liau Index (15.17), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index (11.39), and the Flesch Reading Ease (48.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the analyzed websites were found to be above the sixth-grade readability level recommendations. Efforts need to be made to better tailor online patient education materials to the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7388,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5471568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9780317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online health information is being used more ubiquitously by the general population. However, this information typically favors only a small percentage of readers, which can result in suboptimal medical outcomes for patients.

Objective: The readability of online patient education materials regarding the topic of congestive heart failure was assessed through six readability assessment tools.

Methods: The search phrase "congestive heart failure" was employed into the search engine Google. Out of the first 100 websites, only 70 were included attending to compliance with selection and exclusion criteria. These were then assessed through six readability assessment tools.

Results: Only 5 out of 70 websites were within the limits of the recommended sixth-grade readability level. The mean readability scores were as follows: the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (9.79), Gunning-Fog Score (11.95), Coleman-Liau Index (15.17), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index (11.39), and the Flesch Reading Ease (48.87).

Conclusion: Most of the analyzed websites were found to be above the sixth-grade readability level recommendations. Efforts need to be made to better tailor online patient education materials to the general population.

Abstract Image

充血性心力衰竭在线患者教育材料的可读性评估。
背景:在线健康信息越来越多地被大众使用。然而,这些信息通常只对一小部分读者有利,这可能会给患者带来不理想的医疗效果:通过六种可读性评估工具评估了有关充血性心力衰竭主题的在线患者教育材料的可读性:方法:在谷歌搜索引擎中以 "充血性心力衰竭 "为关键词进行搜索。在前 100 个网站中,只有 70 个符合选择和排除标准。然后通过六种可读性评估工具对这些网站进行评估:结果:在 70 个网站中,只有 5 个网站的可读性达到了建议的六年级水平。平均可读性得分如下:Flesch-Kincaid 等级(9.79)、Gunning-Fog 分数(11.95)、Coleman-Liau 指数(15.17)、Simple Measure of Gobbledygook(SMOG)指数(11.39)和 Flesch Reading Ease(48.87):结论:大多数被分析的网站都高于六年级的可读性建议水平。需要努力使在线患者教育材料更适合普通人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信