Introduction and persistence of tularemia in Bulgaria.

Q1 Environmental Science
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Pub Date : 2017-06-13 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20008686.2017.1323532
Mohammad Khan
{"title":"Introduction and persistence of tularemia in Bulgaria.","authors":"Mohammad Khan","doi":"10.1080/20008686.2017.1323532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myrtannas et al. [1] studied new outbreaks of tularemia in Bulgaria. According to the evidence presented and the data corroborated with by the authors, the new outbreaks occurred after a lull of over three decades in a wide area (1000–1500 km) abutting the Balkan Mountain Range (BMR) near the Bulgarian capital, Sofia. The new epicenter of the tularemia outbreak was 300 km west of the epicenter of the previous outbreak in Eastern Bulgaria. The authors undertook to track the source of the outbreak using molecular methods (e.g. analyses of singlenucleotide polymorphisms of the outbreak isolate). Their study is remarkable for, among other things, the relative lack of the application of traditional epidemiological methods in tandem with the molecular methods. They made no definite conclusion. The authors of the study referred to above did not mention the total number of cases detected during in new outbreaks, making one wonder how the authors defined an outbreak.[2] Also, it was not clear what clinical form of tularemia was detected during the outbreak. This is important, considering that the authors [1] postulated that the high BMR was an inviolable physical barrier to the transmission of Francisella tularensis (FT) from the old to the new foci of outbreaks. However, the high BMR may not necessarily be a physical barrier to the aerosolized transmission of FT.[3] The authors [1] suspected muskrats as the most likely sources of the outbreak strains of FT, yet provided no epidemiologic evidence suggestive of changing activities [4,5] of the animal before (e.g. distinctive muskrat tracks inland or dome-shaped lodges of the animal on water-logged surfaces) or after the outbreaks (e.g. increased number of dead muskrats). Also, absent is any information on the seasonality of the outbreaks studied by Myretennas et al. [1]. Seasonality of the outbreak would have given important clues about the sources of the outbreak strains of FT.[5] The study presented by Myrtannas et al. [1] shows that the genomic study of the outbreak strains of FT uncoupled with traditional epidemiologic approach may not enough to track the source of the pathogen.","PeriodicalId":37446,"journal":{"name":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"1323532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20008686.2017.1323532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Ecology and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2017.1323532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myrtannas et al. [1] studied new outbreaks of tularemia in Bulgaria. According to the evidence presented and the data corroborated with by the authors, the new outbreaks occurred after a lull of over three decades in a wide area (1000–1500 km) abutting the Balkan Mountain Range (BMR) near the Bulgarian capital, Sofia. The new epicenter of the tularemia outbreak was 300 km west of the epicenter of the previous outbreak in Eastern Bulgaria. The authors undertook to track the source of the outbreak using molecular methods (e.g. analyses of singlenucleotide polymorphisms of the outbreak isolate). Their study is remarkable for, among other things, the relative lack of the application of traditional epidemiological methods in tandem with the molecular methods. They made no definite conclusion. The authors of the study referred to above did not mention the total number of cases detected during in new outbreaks, making one wonder how the authors defined an outbreak.[2] Also, it was not clear what clinical form of tularemia was detected during the outbreak. This is important, considering that the authors [1] postulated that the high BMR was an inviolable physical barrier to the transmission of Francisella tularensis (FT) from the old to the new foci of outbreaks. However, the high BMR may not necessarily be a physical barrier to the aerosolized transmission of FT.[3] The authors [1] suspected muskrats as the most likely sources of the outbreak strains of FT, yet provided no epidemiologic evidence suggestive of changing activities [4,5] of the animal before (e.g. distinctive muskrat tracks inland or dome-shaped lodges of the animal on water-logged surfaces) or after the outbreaks (e.g. increased number of dead muskrats). Also, absent is any information on the seasonality of the outbreaks studied by Myretennas et al. [1]. Seasonality of the outbreak would have given important clues about the sources of the outbreak strains of FT.[5] The study presented by Myrtannas et al. [1] shows that the genomic study of the outbreak strains of FT uncoupled with traditional epidemiologic approach may not enough to track the source of the pathogen.
保加利亚土拉菌病的传入和持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology
Infection Ecology and Epidemiology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology aims to stimulate inter-disciplinary collaborations dealing with a range of subjects, from the plethora of zoonotic infections in humans, over diseases with implication in wildlife ecology, to advanced virology and bacteriology. The journal specifically welcomes papers from studies where researchers from multiple medical and ecological disciplines are collaborating so as to increase our knowledge of the emergence, spread and effect of new and re-emerged infectious diseases in humans, domestic animals and wildlife. Main areas of interest include, but are not limited to: 1.Zoonotic microbioorganisms 2.Vector borne infections 3.Gastrointestinal pathogens 4.Antimicrobial resistance 5.Zoonotic microbioorganisms in changing environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信