Robotic Assist-As-Needed as an Alternative to Therapist-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation.

Shraddha Srivastava, Pei Chun Kao, Darcy S Reisman, John P Scholz, Sunil K Agrawal, Jill S Higginson
{"title":"Robotic Assist-As-Needed as an Alternative to Therapist-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation.","authors":"Shraddha Srivastava,&nbsp;Pei Chun Kao,&nbsp;Darcy S Reisman,&nbsp;John P Scholz,&nbsp;Sunil K Agrawal,&nbsp;Jill S Higginson","doi":"10.4172/2329-9096.1000370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training (BWSTT) with therapists' assistance is often used for gait rehabilitation post-stroke. However, this training method is labor-intensive, requiring at least one or as many as three therapists at once for manual assistance. Previously, we demonstrated that providing movement guidance using a performance-based robot-aided gait training (RAGT) that applies a compliant, assist-as-needed force-field improves gait pattern and functional walking ability in people post-stroke. In the current study, we compared the effects of assist-as-needed RAGT combined with functional electrical stimulation and visual feedback with BWSTT to determine if RAGT could serve as an alternative for locomotor training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve stroke survivors were randomly assigned to one of the two groups, either receiving BWSTT with manual assistance or RAGT with functional electrical stimulation and visual feedback. All subjects received fifteen 40-minutes training sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical measures, kinematic data, and EMG data were collected before and immediately after the training for fifteen sessions. Subjects receiving RAGT demonstrated significant improvements in their self-selected over-ground walking speed, Functional Gait Assessment, Timed Up and Go scores, swing-phase peak knee flexion angle, and muscle coordination pattern. Subjects receiving BWSTT demonstrated significant improvements in the Six-minute walk test. However, there was an overall trend toward improvement in most measures with both interventions, thus there were no significant between-group differences in the improvements following training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current findings suggest that RAGT worked at least as well as BWSTT and thus may be used as an alternative rehabilitation method to improve gait pattern post-stroke as it requires less physical effort from the therapists compared to BWSTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":73470,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9096.1000370","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9096.1000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Objective: Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training (BWSTT) with therapists' assistance is often used for gait rehabilitation post-stroke. However, this training method is labor-intensive, requiring at least one or as many as three therapists at once for manual assistance. Previously, we demonstrated that providing movement guidance using a performance-based robot-aided gait training (RAGT) that applies a compliant, assist-as-needed force-field improves gait pattern and functional walking ability in people post-stroke. In the current study, we compared the effects of assist-as-needed RAGT combined with functional electrical stimulation and visual feedback with BWSTT to determine if RAGT could serve as an alternative for locomotor training.

Methods: Twelve stroke survivors were randomly assigned to one of the two groups, either receiving BWSTT with manual assistance or RAGT with functional electrical stimulation and visual feedback. All subjects received fifteen 40-minutes training sessions.

Results: Clinical measures, kinematic data, and EMG data were collected before and immediately after the training for fifteen sessions. Subjects receiving RAGT demonstrated significant improvements in their self-selected over-ground walking speed, Functional Gait Assessment, Timed Up and Go scores, swing-phase peak knee flexion angle, and muscle coordination pattern. Subjects receiving BWSTT demonstrated significant improvements in the Six-minute walk test. However, there was an overall trend toward improvement in most measures with both interventions, thus there were no significant between-group differences in the improvements following training.

Conclusion: The current findings suggest that RAGT worked at least as well as BWSTT and thus may be used as an alternative rehabilitation method to improve gait pattern post-stroke as it requires less physical effort from the therapists compared to BWSTT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人辅助作为治疗师辅助步态康复的替代方案。
目的:身体重量支持跑步机训练(BWSTT)在治疗师的帮助下经常用于中风后的步态康复。然而,这种训练方法是劳动密集型的,需要至少一个或多达三个治疗师同时进行人工辅助。先前,我们证明了使用基于性能的机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)提供运动指导,该训练应用了一个顺从的、按需辅助的力场,可以改善中风后患者的步态模式和功能性行走能力。在目前的研究中,我们比较了按需辅助RAGT结合功能性电刺激和视觉反馈与BWSTT的效果,以确定RAGT是否可以作为运动训练的替代方案。方法:12名脑卒中幸存者被随机分为两组,一组接受手动辅助的BWSTT,另一组接受功能电刺激和视觉反馈的RAGT。所有受试者接受15次40分钟的训练。结果:临床测量、运动数据和肌电数据在训练前和训练后立即收集。接受RAGT的受试者在自我选择的地上行走速度、功能性步态评估、Timed Up和Go评分、摆动阶段膝关节屈曲峰值角度和肌肉协调模式方面均有显著改善。接受BWSTT的受试者在6分钟步行测试中表现出显著的改善。然而,两种干预措施在大多数措施中都有改善的总体趋势,因此在训练后的改善方面没有显著的组间差异。结论:目前的研究结果表明,RAGT的效果至少与BWSTT一样好,因此可以作为一种替代的康复方法来改善中风后的步态模式,因为与BWSTT相比,RAGT对治疗师的体力消耗更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信