Object decision test (BORB): normative data for the adult Quebec population and performance in Alzheimer's disease and the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

Alexandre St-Hilaire, Marie-Claude Blackburn, Maximiliano A Wilson, Robert Laforce, Carol Hudon, Joël Macoir
{"title":"Object decision test (BORB): normative data for the adult Quebec population and performance in Alzheimer's disease and the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.","authors":"Alexandre St-Hilaire,&nbsp;Marie-Claude Blackburn,&nbsp;Maximiliano A Wilson,&nbsp;Robert Laforce,&nbsp;Carol Hudon,&nbsp;Joël Macoir","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2017.1319901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Object decision (OD) test is one subtest of the Birmingham Object Recognition Battery (BORB). It is useful for differential diagnosis among several neurodegenerative diseases. However, normative data provided with this battery count on very few subjects and do not control for the effect of age, which limits interpretability. The purpose of Study 1 was to provide normative data for the OD test of the BORB (version A-hard). The objectives of Study 2 were to establish the diagnostic validity of this task and predictive validity of the normative data in the case of the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).Based on multiple linear regressions, equations to calculate Z-scores corrected for age were provided for 130 participants aged from 47 to 89 years. Performance of 20 healthy participants was compared to that of 14 individuals with svPPA and 18 with AD. After controlling for confounders, participants with svPPA had a lower total score than controls and AD participants. AD participants had a poorer performance than controls only when chimeric objects were considered. Among those with a deficit on the total score of the test, 94% (17/18, including 12 with svPPA) were correctly identified as having a pathological condition (svPPA or AD). This test could help refine differential diagnosis between svPPA and AD patients, especially before the deficits of episodic memory show up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520721,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition","volume":" ","pages":"427-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825585.2017.1319901","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1319901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Object decision (OD) test is one subtest of the Birmingham Object Recognition Battery (BORB). It is useful for differential diagnosis among several neurodegenerative diseases. However, normative data provided with this battery count on very few subjects and do not control for the effect of age, which limits interpretability. The purpose of Study 1 was to provide normative data for the OD test of the BORB (version A-hard). The objectives of Study 2 were to establish the diagnostic validity of this task and predictive validity of the normative data in the case of the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).Based on multiple linear regressions, equations to calculate Z-scores corrected for age were provided for 130 participants aged from 47 to 89 years. Performance of 20 healthy participants was compared to that of 14 individuals with svPPA and 18 with AD. After controlling for confounders, participants with svPPA had a lower total score than controls and AD participants. AD participants had a poorer performance than controls only when chimeric objects were considered. Among those with a deficit on the total score of the test, 94% (17/18, including 12 with svPPA) were correctly identified as having a pathological condition (svPPA or AD). This test could help refine differential diagnosis between svPPA and AD patients, especially before the deficits of episodic memory show up.

对象决策测试(BORB):魁北克成人阿尔茨海默病和原发性进行性失语症语义变体的规范性数据和表现。
目标判断(OD)测试是伯明翰目标识别测试(BORB)的一个子测试。它对几种神经退行性疾病的鉴别诊断是有用的。然而,该系列提供的规范性数据仅涉及极少数受试者,并且没有控制年龄的影响,这限制了可解释性。研究1的目的是为BORB (A-hard版本)的OD测试提供规范性数据。研究2的目的是在原发性进行性失语(svPPA)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的语义变体的情况下,建立该任务的诊断有效性和规范数据的预测有效性。基于多元线性回归,为130名年龄在47岁至89岁之间的参与者提供了计算年龄校正z分数的方程。20名健康参与者的表现与14名svPPA患者和18名AD患者进行了比较。在控制混杂因素后,svPPA参与者的总分低于对照组和AD参与者。只有在考虑嵌合物体时,AD参与者的表现才比对照组差。在测试总分不足的患者中,94%(17/18,包括12名svPPA患者)被正确识别为患有病理状况(svPPA或AD)。这项测试可以帮助细化svPPA和AD患者的鉴别诊断,特别是在情景记忆缺陷出现之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信