A Retrospective Evaluation of Anatomical Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Using an ACL TightRope® RT with a Titanium Cortical Button and Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture: A Preliminary Report.

Q3 Medicine
Jarosław Witkowski, Maciej Kentel, Aleksandra Królikowska, Paweł Reichert
{"title":"A Retrospective Evaluation of Anatomical Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Using an ACL TightRope® RT with a Titanium Cortical Button and Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture: A Preliminary Report.","authors":"Jarosław Witkowski,&nbsp;Maciej Kentel,&nbsp;Aleksandra Królikowska,&nbsp;Paweł Reichert","doi":"10.17219/pim/0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various surgical techniques for treating distal biceps brachii tendon injury have been described, and to date there is no consensus regarding the preferred fixation method for the anatomic reinsertion of the ruptured tendon.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to clinically and functionally evaluate the upper limb after surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon using an ACL TightRope® RT with a titanium cortical button and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture, and to assess postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The sample comprised 3 patients. Clinical examination (history, measurements of the active range of forearm motion, arm circumference, the maximum isometric forearm supination and flexion muscle torque), pain evaluation (on a visual analogue scale [VAS]) and functional assessment (the Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) were carried out. Complications were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the range of motion measurements, arm circumferences and normalized isometric torque values of the muscle groups being studied were comparable in the involved and uninvolved limbs. The MEPI (x = 95.00 ± 10.42) and Quick DASH (x = 8.66 ± 18.04) scores revealed very good results. The VAS results were close to no pain (x = 3.33 ± 5.77 mm). No complications were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preliminary comprehensive clinical and functional assessment of the upper limb justify the clinical use of the ACL TightRope® RT with a titanium cortical button and UHMWPE suture in surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. The early results with a small sample were encouraging, but studies with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20355,"journal":{"name":"Polimery w medycynie","volume":"46 2","pages":"163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polimery w medycynie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/pim/0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Various surgical techniques for treating distal biceps brachii tendon injury have been described, and to date there is no consensus regarding the preferred fixation method for the anatomic reinsertion of the ruptured tendon.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to clinically and functionally evaluate the upper limb after surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon using an ACL TightRope® RT with a titanium cortical button and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture, and to assess postoperative complications.

Material and methods: The sample comprised 3 patients. Clinical examination (history, measurements of the active range of forearm motion, arm circumference, the maximum isometric forearm supination and flexion muscle torque), pain evaluation (on a visual analogue scale [VAS]) and functional assessment (the Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) were carried out. Complications were documented.

Results: The results of the range of motion measurements, arm circumferences and normalized isometric torque values of the muscle groups being studied were comparable in the involved and uninvolved limbs. The MEPI (x = 95.00 ± 10.42) and Quick DASH (x = 8.66 ± 18.04) scores revealed very good results. The VAS results were close to no pain (x = 3.33 ± 5.77 mm). No complications were noted.

Conclusions: The preliminary comprehensive clinical and functional assessment of the upper limb justify the clinical use of the ACL TightRope® RT with a titanium cortical button and UHMWPE suture in surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. The early results with a small sample were encouraging, but studies with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up are needed.

使用ACL TightRope®RT结合钛皮质扣和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线对肱二头肌远端肌腱解剖复位的回顾性评价:初步报告。
背景:治疗肱二头肌远端肌腱损伤的各种手术技术已经被描述过,迄今为止,对于断裂肌腱解剖再插入的首选固定方法尚无共识。目的:本研究的目的是使用ACL TightRope®RT带钛皮质扣和超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)缝线对肱二头肌远端肌腱手术解剖复位后的上肢进行临床和功能评估,并评估术后并发症。材料和方法:样本包括3例患者。进行临床检查(病史、前臂活动范围测量、臂围、前臂旋后和屈曲肌最大等距扭矩)、疼痛评估(视觉模拟量表[VAS])和功能评估(梅奥肘部表现指数[MEPI]和手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾[DASH])。并发症记录在案。结果:受累肢体和未受累肢体的运动范围测量、手臂周长和所研究肌肉群的归一化等距扭矩值的结果具有可比性。MEPI评分(x = 95.00±10.42)和Quick DASH评分(x = 8.66±18.04)显示效果良好。VAS结果接近无痛(x = 3.33±5.77 mm)。无并发症。结论:初步的综合临床和上肢功能评估证明了ACL TightRope®RT与钛皮质扣和UHMWPE缝合在肱二头肌远端肌腱手术解剖内固定的临床应用。小样本的早期结果令人鼓舞,但需要更多病例和更长时间的随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polimery w medycynie
Polimery w medycynie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信