Age-related differences on a new test of temporal order memory for everyday events.

P Michelle Seewald, Shannon Y De Jesus, Lisa V Graves, Charles C Moreno, Sarah N Mattson, Paul E Gilbert
{"title":"Age-related differences on a new test of temporal order memory for everyday events.","authors":"P Michelle Seewald,&nbsp;Shannon Y De Jesus,&nbsp;Lisa V Graves,&nbsp;Charles C Moreno,&nbsp;Sarah N Mattson,&nbsp;Paul E Gilbert","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2017.1298716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed a new test to examine incidental temporal order memory for a self-generated sequence of tasks one might complete in everyday life. Young and older adults were given 10 cards, each listing a task one might accomplish in a typical day. Participants were asked to self-generate a \"to do\" list by placing the 10 cards in a sequence representing the order in which they would accomplish the tasks, but were not informed of a subsequent memory test. We assessed immediate free recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall for the order of the tasks in the sequence. Older adults were significantly impaired relative to young adults on immediate free recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall. Correlation analyses with standardized neuropsychological tests provide preliminary evidence for construct validity for our test, which is portable and can be rapidly administered in clinical or laboratory settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520721,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition","volume":" ","pages":"319-332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825585.2017.1298716","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1298716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We developed a new test to examine incidental temporal order memory for a self-generated sequence of tasks one might complete in everyday life. Young and older adults were given 10 cards, each listing a task one might accomplish in a typical day. Participants were asked to self-generate a "to do" list by placing the 10 cards in a sequence representing the order in which they would accomplish the tasks, but were not informed of a subsequent memory test. We assessed immediate free recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall for the order of the tasks in the sequence. Older adults were significantly impaired relative to young adults on immediate free recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall. Correlation analyses with standardized neuropsychological tests provide preliminary evidence for construct validity for our test, which is portable and can be rapidly administered in clinical or laboratory settings.

Abstract Image

日常事件的时间顺序记忆的新测试中与年龄相关的差异。
我们开发了一个新的测试来检查偶然的时间顺序记忆的自我生成的任务序列,一个人可能在日常生活中完成。年轻人和老年人分别得到了10张卡片,每张卡片上都列出了一个人在典型的一天中可能完成的任务。研究人员要求参与者按照完成任务的顺序,将10张卡片按顺序排列,从而生成一张“任务清单”,但不告知他们随后会进行记忆测试。我们评估了即时自由回忆、延迟自由回忆和延迟线索回忆的顺序。与年轻人相比,老年人在即时自由回忆、延迟自由回忆和延迟提示回忆上明显受损。与标准化神经心理学测试的相关分析为我们的测试的结构效度提供了初步证据,该测试是便携式的,可以在临床或实验室环境中快速实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信