Indirect tolerability comparison of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine for Huntington disease.

Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2017-03-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40734-017-0051-5
Daniel O Claassen, Benjamin Carroll, Lisa M De Boer, Eric Wu, Rajeev Ayyagari, Sanjay Gandhi, David Stamler
{"title":"Indirect tolerability comparison of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine for Huntington disease.","authors":"Daniel O Claassen,&nbsp;Benjamin Carroll,&nbsp;Lisa M De Boer,&nbsp;Eric Wu,&nbsp;Rajeev Ayyagari,&nbsp;Sanjay Gandhi,&nbsp;David Stamler","doi":"10.1186/s40734-017-0051-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors can improve hyperkinetic movements, and are effective treatment options for chorea of Huntington disease (HD). Tetrabenazine was assessed for treating chorea in the TETRA-HD trial, and while efficacious, there are tolerability concerns possibly due to its pharmacokinetic properties. Deutetrabenazine is a novel VMAT2 inhibitor that contains deuterium, which extends active metabolite half-lives and minimizes drug concentration fluctuations. In the First-HD trial, deutetrabenazine was efficacious in treating chorea and was generally well tolerated. In the absence of a head-to-head trial, we performed an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of the tolerability of deutetrabenazine and tetrabenazine for the treatment of HD-associated chorea, as observed in the First-HD and TETRA-HD trials, using well-established comparison methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Phase III, 12-week, parallel-group, clinical trials First-HD (<i>N</i> = 90) and TETRA-HD (<i>N</i> = 84) were used to conduct an ITC of the tolerability of deutetrabenazine versus tetrabenazine using two anchor-based methods: Bucher comparison for unadjusted ITCs, and matching indirect comparison for adjusted ITCs. Overall adverse events (AEs; mild, moderate, and severe), serious AEs, specific AEs occurring in ≥10% of patients, and discontinuations (all-cause and AE-related) were included in the analysis. The risk differences of these outcomes for deutetrabenazine and tetrabenazine were estimated by subtracting the applicable placebo-adjusted risk in First-HD from that of TETRA-HD. Sensitivity analyses were performed to address differences between trials, and <i>p</i>-values were obtained from z-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with tetrabenazine, deutetrabenazine was associated with a significantly lower risk of moderate to severe AEs and neuropsychiatric AEs including agitation, akathisia, depression, depression/agitated depression, drowsiness/somnolence, insomnia, and parkinsonism in both adjusted and unadjusted analyses (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for each). Deutetrabenazine had a significantly lower rate of dose reduction or dose reduction/suspension in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for each). Deutetrabenazine resulted in numerically more mild AEs, such as diarrhea and coughing; however, these results were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This indirect treatment comparison demonstrates that for the treatment of HD chorea, deutetrabenazine has a favorable tolerability profile compared to tetrabenazine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01795859 and NCT00219804.</p>","PeriodicalId":15374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","volume":"4 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40734-017-0051-5","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-017-0051-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Background: Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors can improve hyperkinetic movements, and are effective treatment options for chorea of Huntington disease (HD). Tetrabenazine was assessed for treating chorea in the TETRA-HD trial, and while efficacious, there are tolerability concerns possibly due to its pharmacokinetic properties. Deutetrabenazine is a novel VMAT2 inhibitor that contains deuterium, which extends active metabolite half-lives and minimizes drug concentration fluctuations. In the First-HD trial, deutetrabenazine was efficacious in treating chorea and was generally well tolerated. In the absence of a head-to-head trial, we performed an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of the tolerability of deutetrabenazine and tetrabenazine for the treatment of HD-associated chorea, as observed in the First-HD and TETRA-HD trials, using well-established comparison methods.

Methods: Data from the Phase III, 12-week, parallel-group, clinical trials First-HD (N = 90) and TETRA-HD (N = 84) were used to conduct an ITC of the tolerability of deutetrabenazine versus tetrabenazine using two anchor-based methods: Bucher comparison for unadjusted ITCs, and matching indirect comparison for adjusted ITCs. Overall adverse events (AEs; mild, moderate, and severe), serious AEs, specific AEs occurring in ≥10% of patients, and discontinuations (all-cause and AE-related) were included in the analysis. The risk differences of these outcomes for deutetrabenazine and tetrabenazine were estimated by subtracting the applicable placebo-adjusted risk in First-HD from that of TETRA-HD. Sensitivity analyses were performed to address differences between trials, and p-values were obtained from z-tests.

Results: Compared with tetrabenazine, deutetrabenazine was associated with a significantly lower risk of moderate to severe AEs and neuropsychiatric AEs including agitation, akathisia, depression, depression/agitated depression, drowsiness/somnolence, insomnia, and parkinsonism in both adjusted and unadjusted analyses (p < 0.05 for each). Deutetrabenazine had a significantly lower rate of dose reduction or dose reduction/suspension in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses (p < 0.001 for each). Deutetrabenazine resulted in numerically more mild AEs, such as diarrhea and coughing; however, these results were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: This indirect treatment comparison demonstrates that for the treatment of HD chorea, deutetrabenazine has a favorable tolerability profile compared to tetrabenazine.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01795859 and NCT00219804.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

四苯那嗪与四苯那嗪治疗亨廷顿病的间接耐受性比较。
背景:水疱单胺转运蛋白2 (VMAT2)抑制剂可以改善多动运动,是亨廷顿舞蹈病(HD)的有效治疗选择。在四苯那嗪治疗舞蹈病的试验中进行了评估,虽然有效,但由于其药代动力学特性,可能存在耐受性问题。Deutetrabenazine是一种含有氘的新型VMAT2抑制剂,可延长活性代谢物的半衰期并最大限度地减少药物浓度波动。在First-HD试验中,deutetrabenazine对治疗舞蹈病是有效的,并且通常耐受性良好。在没有头对头试验的情况下,我们使用成熟的比较方法,对deutetrabenazine和tetrabenazine治疗hd相关性舞蹈病的耐受性进行了间接治疗比较(ITC),正如在First-HD和TETRA-HD试验中观察到的那样。方法:采用III期、12周、平行组临床试验First-HD (N = 90)和TETRA-HD (N = 84)的数据,采用两种锚定方法:未调整ITCs的Bucher比较和调整ITCs的匹配间接比较,对去四苯那嗪与四苯那嗪的耐受性进行ITC。总不良事件(ae);分析包括轻度、中度和重度ae)、严重ae、特异性ae发生率≥10%以及停药(全因和ae相关)。deutetrabenazine和tetrabenazine的这些结果的风险差异是通过从TETRA-HD中减去适用的安慰剂调整风险来估计的。进行敏感性分析以解决试验之间的差异,并从z检验中获得p值。结果:与四苯那嗪相比,在调整和非调整分析中,二苯那嗪与中度至重度不良事件和神经精神不良事件(包括躁动、静坐症、抑郁、抑郁/激动性抑郁、嗜睡/嗜睡、失眠和帕金森病)的风险均显著降低(p p)。这种间接治疗比较表明,对于HD舞蹈病的治疗,与四苯那嗪相比,去氘苯那嗪具有良好的耐受性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01795859和NCT00219804。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信