Profile of human anti-rabies treatment in the 'agreste' region of Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2010-2012.

Cleber Vinicius Brito Dos Santos, Rafaely Bezerra de Melo, Daniel Friguglietti Brandespim
{"title":"Profile of human anti-rabies treatment in the 'agreste' region of Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2010-2012.","authors":"Cleber Vinicius Brito Dos Santos,&nbsp;Rafaely Bezerra de Melo,&nbsp;Daniel Friguglietti Brandespim","doi":"10.5123/S1679-49742017000100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to describe the characteristics of reported human anti-rabies treatment in municipalities of the 'agreste' region of Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2010-2012.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>this was a descriptive study using data from human anti-rabies medical records filed on the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10,138 reported records of anti-rabies treatment were included; canines were the most involved species (68.1%), in good health condition (79.9%). Biting was the most common contact (83.8%), causing multiple injuries (58.3%), to hands/feet (39.4%), and deep wounds in 56.8% of cases; combined vaccine + serum administration frequency was found to be low (10.5%), even though 47.9% of injuries were considered severe and therefore required this prophylactic procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>possible inadequate prophylaxis procedures were found, showing the need for health worker training aimed at ensuring correct human anti-rabies prophylaxis and the proper filling in of medical record files.</p>","PeriodicalId":520611,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000100017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: to describe the characteristics of reported human anti-rabies treatment in municipalities of the 'agreste' region of Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2010-2012.

Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from human anti-rabies medical records filed on the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan).

Results: 10,138 reported records of anti-rabies treatment were included; canines were the most involved species (68.1%), in good health condition (79.9%). Biting was the most common contact (83.8%), causing multiple injuries (58.3%), to hands/feet (39.4%), and deep wounds in 56.8% of cases; combined vaccine + serum administration frequency was found to be low (10.5%), even though 47.9% of injuries were considered severe and therefore required this prophylactic procedure.

Conclusion: possible inadequate prophylaxis procedures were found, showing the need for health worker training aimed at ensuring correct human anti-rabies prophylaxis and the proper filling in of medical record files.

2010-2012年巴西伯南布哥州“格里斯特”地区人类抗狂犬病治疗概况
目的:描述2010-2012年巴西伯南布哥州“格里斯特”地区各市报告的人类抗狂犬病治疗的特点。方法:本研究是一项描述性研究,数据来源于法定传染病信息系统(思南市)备案的人类抗狂犬病病历。结果:共纳入抗狂犬病治疗报告10138例;犬类是感染最多的种类(68.1%),健康状况良好(79.9%)。咬伤是最常见的接触方式(83.8%),造成多处损伤(58.3%)、手/脚损伤(39.4%)和深伤(56.8%);尽管47.9%的损伤被认为是严重的,因此需要采取这种预防措施,但联合疫苗+血清给药的频率很低(10.5%)。结论:发现预防程序可能不充分,表明需要对卫生工作者进行培训,以确保正确的人类抗狂犬病预防和正确填写病历文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信