Necessidades de assistência à criança com deficiência – Uso do Inventário de Avaliação Pediátrica de Incapacidade

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Fernanda Moreira Teles, Rosa Resegue, Rosana Fiorini Puccini
{"title":"Necessidades de assistência à criança com deficiência – Uso do Inventário de Avaliação Pediátrica de Incapacidade","authors":"Fernanda Moreira Teles,&nbsp;Rosa Resegue,&nbsp;Rosana Fiorini Puccini","doi":"10.1016/j.rpped.2016.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the care needs reported by caregivers of children with disabilities going through the school inclusion process using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross‐sectional study with 181 children aged 7 to 10 years with physical or mental disabilities, undergoing the inclusion process in Elementary school in 2007. Location: 31 schools of the Regional Education Board ‐ District of Penha, East Side the city of São Paulo. The children's care needs according to the caregivers were assessed in three areas ‐ self‐care, mobility and social function, using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, according to the following score: 5, Independent; 4, Supervision; 3, Minimum Assistance; 2, Moderate Assistance; 1, Maximum Assistance and 0, Total Assistance. For statistical analysis, we used Student's <em>t</em>‐test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), with <em>p</em>&lt;0.05 being statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lower means, with statistically significant differences, were observed for the items related to social function (55.8 to 72.0), followed by self‐care functions (56.0 to 96.5); for all types of disabilities, except for children with physical disabilities, who had lower means for self‐care (56.0) and mobility (63.8).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Social function was the area referred to as the one that needed a higher degree of assistance from the caregiver and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory is a tool that can help identify these needs and develop a more targeted intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21311,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista De Pediatria","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 447-453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rpped.2016.02.007","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista De Pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0103058216000265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective

To describe the care needs reported by caregivers of children with disabilities going through the school inclusion process using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.

Methods

Cross‐sectional study with 181 children aged 7 to 10 years with physical or mental disabilities, undergoing the inclusion process in Elementary school in 2007. Location: 31 schools of the Regional Education Board ‐ District of Penha, East Side the city of São Paulo. The children's care needs according to the caregivers were assessed in three areas ‐ self‐care, mobility and social function, using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, according to the following score: 5, Independent; 4, Supervision; 3, Minimum Assistance; 2, Moderate Assistance; 1, Maximum Assistance and 0, Total Assistance. For statistical analysis, we used Student's t‐test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), with p<0.05 being statistically significant.

Results

The lower means, with statistically significant differences, were observed for the items related to social function (55.8 to 72.0), followed by self‐care functions (56.0 to 96.5); for all types of disabilities, except for children with physical disabilities, who had lower means for self‐care (56.0) and mobility (63.8).

Conclusions

Social function was the area referred to as the one that needed a higher degree of assistance from the caregiver and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory is a tool that can help identify these needs and develop a more targeted intervention.

Abstract Image

残疾儿童的护理需求-使用儿科残疾评估清单
目的利用《儿童残疾评估量表》描述残疾儿童入学融合过程中照顾者报告的照顾需求。方法采用横断面研究方法,对2007年在小学接受融合治疗的181名7 ~ 10岁身体或精神残疾儿童进行研究。地点:31所学校的区域教育委员会-区Penha,东侧的城市圣保罗。采用《儿童残疾评估量表》,从自我护理、行动能力和社会功能三个方面评估照顾者对儿童的照顾需求,得分为:5分(独立);4、监督;3、最低援助;2、适度援助;1,最大援助和0,总援助。对于统计分析,我们使用学生t检验和方差分析(ANOVA), p<0.05具有统计学意义。结果社会功能(55.8 ~ 72.0)得分较低,自我照顾功能(56.0 ~ 96.5)得分次之,差异有统计学意义;对于所有类型的残疾,除了身体残疾的儿童,他们的自我照顾能力(56.0分)和行动能力(63.8分)都较低。社会功能被认为是需要照顾者更高程度帮助的领域,儿科残疾评估量表是一个工具,可以帮助识别这些需求并制定更有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Paulista De Pediatria
Revista Paulista De Pediatria Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Paulista de Pediatria publishes original contributions, case reports and review of clinical research with methodological approach in the areas of health and disease of neonates, infants, children and adolescents. The objective is to disseminate research with methodological quality on issues that comprise the health of children and adolescents. All articles are freely available online, via SciELO. Its abbreviated title is Rev. Paul. Pediatr., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信