Efficacy and Safety of Modified Pranlukast (Prakanon(®)) Compared with Pranlukast (Onon(®)): A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study.

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2016-06-30 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874306401610010036
Seo W Kim, Hunam Kim, Yon J Ryu, Jin H Lee, Sung S Shim, Yoo K Kim, Jung H Chang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Modified Pranlukast (Prakanon(®)) Compared with Pranlukast (Onon(®)): A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study.","authors":"Seo W Kim,&nbsp;Hunam Kim,&nbsp;Yon J Ryu,&nbsp;Jin H Lee,&nbsp;Sung S Shim,&nbsp;Yoo K Kim,&nbsp;Jung H Chang","doi":"10.2174/1874306401610010036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pranlukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) that is used as an additional controller of mild to moderate asthma. This study compared the efficacy and side effects of two bioequivalent preparations of pranlukast: original pranlukast (Onon(®); Ono Pharmaceutical, Japan) and a modified formulation of pranlukast (Prakanon(®); Yuhan Co, Korea) in patients with mild to moderate asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 34 subjects screened, 30 patients who were using standard medication to control asthma and scored less than 20 points on the Asthma Control Test(™) (ACT) were assigned randomly to one of the two groups in a prospective, open label, crossover study: group 1 received Prakanon(®) (150 mg/day) and group 2 received Onon(®) (450 mg/day) for 8 weeks each; after a 1-week rest period, the groups were switched to the alternative medication for further 8 weeks and monitored for 2 more weeks without study medication. Evaluation parameters included the ACT, quality of life questionnaire adult Korean asthmatics (QLQAKA), pulmonary function tests, peripheral blood tests, vital signs, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were enrolled and 21 completed the trial: 10 in group 1 and 11 in group 2. The baseline data of the two groups did not differ. No statistical significant differences were observed in efficacy and lung function at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two kinds of pranlukast. The final asthma control rate was 81% with Prakanon(®) and 76% with Onon(®). There were no differences in vital signs and laboratory data at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two drugs. There were no differences in adverse events between the two drugs. The most common side effect was abdominal pain. Drug compliance was high, without differences between the two drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that Prakanon(®) which is an improved formulation of pranlukast at a lower dose than the original formulation, Onon(®), has a similar efficacy and side effect profile in the control of persistent asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"10 ","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/31/fb/TORMJ-10-36.PMC4951783.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306401610010036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Pranlukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) that is used as an additional controller of mild to moderate asthma. This study compared the efficacy and side effects of two bioequivalent preparations of pranlukast: original pranlukast (Onon(®); Ono Pharmaceutical, Japan) and a modified formulation of pranlukast (Prakanon(®); Yuhan Co, Korea) in patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Methods: Of the 34 subjects screened, 30 patients who were using standard medication to control asthma and scored less than 20 points on the Asthma Control Test(™) (ACT) were assigned randomly to one of the two groups in a prospective, open label, crossover study: group 1 received Prakanon(®) (150 mg/day) and group 2 received Onon(®) (450 mg/day) for 8 weeks each; after a 1-week rest period, the groups were switched to the alternative medication for further 8 weeks and monitored for 2 more weeks without study medication. Evaluation parameters included the ACT, quality of life questionnaire adult Korean asthmatics (QLQAKA), pulmonary function tests, peripheral blood tests, vital signs, and adverse events.

Results: Thirty patients were enrolled and 21 completed the trial: 10 in group 1 and 11 in group 2. The baseline data of the two groups did not differ. No statistical significant differences were observed in efficacy and lung function at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two kinds of pranlukast. The final asthma control rate was 81% with Prakanon(®) and 76% with Onon(®). There were no differences in vital signs and laboratory data at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two drugs. There were no differences in adverse events between the two drugs. The most common side effect was abdominal pain. Drug compliance was high, without differences between the two drugs.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that Prakanon(®) which is an improved formulation of pranlukast at a lower dose than the original formulation, Onon(®), has a similar efficacy and side effect profile in the control of persistent asthma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改良Pranlukast (Prakanon(®))与Pranlukast (Onon(®))的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究。
Pranlukast是一种白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA),用于轻度至中度哮喘的额外控制器。本研究比较了两种生物等效pranlukast制剂的疗效和副作用:原pranlukast (Onon(®);Ono Pharmaceutical, Japan)和pranlukast的改良配方(Prakanon(®);Yuhan Co, Korea)在轻度至中度哮喘患者中的应用。方法:在筛选的34名受试者中,30名使用标准药物控制哮喘且哮喘控制测试(ACT)得分低于20分的患者被随机分配到两组中的一组,这是一项前瞻性、开放标签、交叉研究:1组接受Prakanon(®)(150 mg/天),2组接受Onon(®)(450 mg/天),各8周;在1周的休息期后,这些组再切换到替代药物8周,并在没有研究药物的情况下再监测2周。评估参数包括ACT、韩国成人哮喘患者生活质量问卷(QLQAKA)、肺功能检查、外周血检查、生命体征和不良事件。结果:30例患者入组,21例完成试验:1组10例,2组11例。两组的基线数据没有差异。两种普芦司特每次的疗效和肺功能以及与基线值相比的变化均无统计学差异。Prakanon(®)和Onon(®)的最终哮喘控制率分别为81%和76%。两种药物每次的生命体征和实验室数据以及基线值的变化均无差异。两种药物之间的不良事件没有差异。最常见的副作用是腹痛。用药依从性高,两药间无差异。结论:这些研究结果表明Prakanon(®)是pranlukast的改进制剂,其剂量低于原制剂Onon(®),在控制持续性哮喘方面具有相似的疗效和副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信