A pilot study evaluating the use of ABCD2 score in pre-hospital assessment of patients with suspected transient ischaemic attack: experience and lessons learned.

Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine Pub Date : 2016-08-20 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13231-016-0020-3
Scott Munro, Sally Rodbard, Khalid Ali, Claire Horsfield, Wendy Knibb, Janet Holah, Ottilia Speirs, Tom Quinn
{"title":"A pilot study evaluating the use of ABCD2 score in pre-hospital assessment of patients with suspected transient ischaemic attack: experience and lessons learned.","authors":"Scott Munro,&nbsp;Sally Rodbard,&nbsp;Khalid Ali,&nbsp;Claire Horsfield,&nbsp;Wendy Knibb,&nbsp;Janet Holah,&nbsp;Ottilia Speirs,&nbsp;Tom Quinn","doi":"10.1186/s13231-016-0020-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is a common presentation to emergency medical services (EMS) in the United Kingdom (UK). Several EMS systems have adopted the ABCD2 score to aid pre-hospital risk stratification and decision-making on patient disposition, such as direct referral to an Emergency Department or specialist TIA clinic. However, the ABCD2 score, developed for hospital use, has not been validated for use in the pre-hospital context of EMS care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot study to assess eligibility criteria, recruitment rates, protocol compliance, consent and follow-up procedures to inform the development of a definitive study to validate the ABCD2 tool in pre-hospital evaluation of patients with suspected TIA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1st May-1st September 2013, nine patients with an EMS suspected diagnosis of TIA had the TIA diagnosis later confirmed by a specialist from five participating sites. This recruitment rate is comparable to stroke trials in the EMS setting. Bureaucratic obstacles and duplication of approval processes across participating sites took 13 months to resolve before recruitment commenced. Due to the initial difficulty in recruitment, a substantial amendment was approved to modify inclusion criteria, allowing patients with atrial fibrillation and/or taking anticoagulant therapy to participate in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible to identify, recruit and follow up patients with suspected TIA in the EMS setting. Training large numbers of EMS staff is required as exposure to TIA patients is infrequent. Significant insight was gained into the complexity of NHS research governance mechanisms in the UK. This knowledge will facilitate the planning of a future adequately powered study to validate the ABCD2 tool in a pre-hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13231-016-0020-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13231-016-0020-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is a common presentation to emergency medical services (EMS) in the United Kingdom (UK). Several EMS systems have adopted the ABCD2 score to aid pre-hospital risk stratification and decision-making on patient disposition, such as direct referral to an Emergency Department or specialist TIA clinic. However, the ABCD2 score, developed for hospital use, has not been validated for use in the pre-hospital context of EMS care.

Methods: We conducted a pilot study to assess eligibility criteria, recruitment rates, protocol compliance, consent and follow-up procedures to inform the development of a definitive study to validate the ABCD2 tool in pre-hospital evaluation of patients with suspected TIA.

Results: From 1st May-1st September 2013, nine patients with an EMS suspected diagnosis of TIA had the TIA diagnosis later confirmed by a specialist from five participating sites. This recruitment rate is comparable to stroke trials in the EMS setting. Bureaucratic obstacles and duplication of approval processes across participating sites took 13 months to resolve before recruitment commenced. Due to the initial difficulty in recruitment, a substantial amendment was approved to modify inclusion criteria, allowing patients with atrial fibrillation and/or taking anticoagulant therapy to participate in the study.

Conclusions: It is possible to identify, recruit and follow up patients with suspected TIA in the EMS setting. Training large numbers of EMS staff is required as exposure to TIA patients is infrequent. Significant insight was gained into the complexity of NHS research governance mechanisms in the UK. This knowledge will facilitate the planning of a future adequately powered study to validate the ABCD2 tool in a pre-hospital setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项评估ABCD2评分在疑似短暂性缺血性发作患者院前评估中的应用的试点研究:经验和教训
背景:怀疑短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)是英国紧急医疗服务(EMS)的常见表现。一些EMS系统采用ABCD2评分来帮助院前风险分层和患者处置决策,例如直接转诊到急诊科或专科TIA诊所。然而,为医院使用而开发的ABCD2评分尚未被验证用于院前EMS护理。方法:我们进行了一项试点研究,以评估资格标准、招募率、方案依从性、同意和随访程序,为制定一项明确的研究提供信息,以验证ABCD2工具在院前评估疑似TIA患者中的作用。结果:2013年5月1日至9月1日,9例EMS疑似TIA患者经5个参与站点的专家确诊为TIA。这一招募率与EMS环境下的卒中试验相当。官僚主义障碍和参与网站的重复审批过程花了13个月的时间才解决,然后才开始招聘。由于最初招募的困难,一项实质性的修订被批准修改纳入标准,允许心房颤动和/或接受抗凝治疗的患者参与研究。结论:在EMS环境中识别、招募和随访疑似TIA患者是可能的。由于接触TIA患者很少,因此需要培训大量的EMS工作人员。重要的洞察力获得了NHS研究治理机制的复杂性在英国。这一知识将有助于规划未来充分有力的研究,以验证ABCD2工具在院前环境中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信