[History of anatomy - academy history. On the development of scientific academies in the Third Reich exemplified by anatomy].

Acta historica Leopoldina Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Florian Steger, Mathias Schütz
{"title":"[History of anatomy - academy history. On the development of scientific academies in the Third Reich exemplified by anatomy].","authors":"Florian Steger,&nbsp;Mathias Schütz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on the history of National Socialism has for decades ignored the German academies of sciences as well as the subject of anatomy. This was due to the rather minor roles the societies played in the scientific policy of the Third Reich and role anatomy played in medicine during this period of time. Recent investigations in both subjects were able to show how worthwhile the dealing with seemingly minor aspects of National Socialist policies is: Those aspects can especially help to sharpen the historical judgment of scientific and political actions. On the basis of recent archival research this article tries to present and analyze the subject of anatomy and the academies of sciences regarding their reciprocal relationship between 1933 and 1945. Besides the Leopoldina, the Prussian and the Bavarian Academies of Sciences will be focused on: By the examples of the anatomists represented in these societies it can be shown how anatomy as well as the societies developed under National Socialism and which general tendencies, entanglements and differences are relevant for the matter. The insight in this relationship focuses on the one hand on the anatomists represented in the societies. On the other hand it deals with the presence of anatomical research in the society, their meetings and publications, and especially with ideology and crimes reflected in this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7006,"journal":{"name":"Acta historica Leopoldina","volume":" 64","pages":"259-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta historica Leopoldina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the history of National Socialism has for decades ignored the German academies of sciences as well as the subject of anatomy. This was due to the rather minor roles the societies played in the scientific policy of the Third Reich and role anatomy played in medicine during this period of time. Recent investigations in both subjects were able to show how worthwhile the dealing with seemingly minor aspects of National Socialist policies is: Those aspects can especially help to sharpen the historical judgment of scientific and political actions. On the basis of recent archival research this article tries to present and analyze the subject of anatomy and the academies of sciences regarding their reciprocal relationship between 1933 and 1945. Besides the Leopoldina, the Prussian and the Bavarian Academies of Sciences will be focused on: By the examples of the anatomists represented in these societies it can be shown how anatomy as well as the societies developed under National Socialism and which general tendencies, entanglements and differences are relevant for the matter. The insight in this relationship focuses on the one hand on the anatomists represented in the societies. On the other hand it deals with the presence of anatomical research in the society, their meetings and publications, and especially with ideology and crimes reflected in this research.

解剖学的历史-学院史。第三帝国科学院的发展[以解剖学为例]。
几十年来,对国家社会主义历史的研究一直忽视了德国科学院和解剖学这一学科。这是由于社会在第三帝国的科学政策中所起的作用相当小,而解剖学在这一时期在医学中所起的作用也很小。最近对这两个主题的调查表明,处理国家社会主义政策看似微不足道的方面是多么值得:这些方面尤其有助于提高对科学和政治行动的历史判断。本文以近年来的档案研究为基础,对1933年至1945年解剖学科与科学院之间的相互关系进行了介绍和分析。除了利奥波迪那科学院,普鲁士和巴伐利亚科学院也将被重点关注:通过这些学会中代表的解剖学家的例子,可以显示出在国家社会主义下解剖学和社会是如何发展的,以及哪些一般趋势、纠缠和差异与此有关。这种关系的洞察力一方面集中在社会中所代表的解剖学家。另一方面,它涉及解剖学研究在社会中的存在,他们的会议和出版物,特别是在这项研究中反映的意识形态和犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信