Metabolic Syndrome and its Profound Effect on Prevalence of Ischemic Stroke.

Brandon P Lucke-Wold, Kenneth DiPasquale, Aric F Logsdon, Linda Nguyen, A Noelle Lucke-Wold, Ryan C Turner, Jason D Huber, Charles L Rosen
{"title":"Metabolic Syndrome and its Profound Effect on Prevalence of Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Brandon P Lucke-Wold, Kenneth DiPasquale, Aric F Logsdon, Linda Nguyen, A Noelle Lucke-Wold, Ryan C Turner, Jason D Huber, Charles L Rosen","doi":"10.15422/amsrj.2014.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ischemic stroke represents a leading cause of death worldwide and the leading cause of disability in the United States. Greater than 8% of all deaths are attributed to ischemic stroke. This rate is consistent with the heightened burden of cardiovascular disease deaths. Treatments for acute ischemic stroke remain limited to tissue plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombolysis, both of which require significant medical expertise and can only be applied to a select number of patients based on time of presentation, imaging, and absence of contraindications. Over 1,000 compounds that were successful in treating ischemic stroke in animal models have failed to correlate to success in clinical trials. The search for alternative treatments is ongoing, drawing greater attention to the importance of preclinical models that more accurately represent the clinical population through incorporation of common risk factors. This work reviews the contribution of these commonly observed risk factors in the clinical population highlighting both the pathophysiology as well as current clinical diagnosis and treatment standards. We also highlight future potential therapeutic targets, areas requiring further investigation, and recent changes in best-practice clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":91447,"journal":{"name":"American medical student research journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4896644/pdf/nihms789406.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American medical student research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15422/amsrj.2014.05.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ischemic stroke represents a leading cause of death worldwide and the leading cause of disability in the United States. Greater than 8% of all deaths are attributed to ischemic stroke. This rate is consistent with the heightened burden of cardiovascular disease deaths. Treatments for acute ischemic stroke remain limited to tissue plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombolysis, both of which require significant medical expertise and can only be applied to a select number of patients based on time of presentation, imaging, and absence of contraindications. Over 1,000 compounds that were successful in treating ischemic stroke in animal models have failed to correlate to success in clinical trials. The search for alternative treatments is ongoing, drawing greater attention to the importance of preclinical models that more accurately represent the clinical population through incorporation of common risk factors. This work reviews the contribution of these commonly observed risk factors in the clinical population highlighting both the pathophysiology as well as current clinical diagnosis and treatment standards. We also highlight future potential therapeutic targets, areas requiring further investigation, and recent changes in best-practice clinical care.

Abstract Image

代谢综合征及其对缺血性中风发病率的深远影响
缺血性中风是全球死亡的主要原因,也是美国致残的主要原因。超过 8%的死亡归因于缺血性中风。这一比例与心血管疾病死亡负担的加重相一致。急性缺血性脑卒中的治疗方法仍然局限于组织浆细胞酶原激活剂和机械溶栓,这两种方法都需要大量的医学专业知识,而且只能根据发病时间、影像学检查和无禁忌症的情况选择性地应用于部分患者。在动物模型中成功治疗缺血性中风的 1,000 多种化合物在临床试验中均未取得成功。寻找替代治疗方法的工作仍在进行,这使人们更加关注临床前模型的重要性,通过纳入常见的风险因素,临床前模型能更准确地代表临床人群。本研究回顾了这些常见风险因素在临床人群中的作用,强调了病理生理学以及当前的临床诊断和治疗标准。我们还强调了未来潜在的治疗目标、需要进一步研究的领域以及最佳临床护理实践的最新变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信