The Use of Guidelines for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Tanzania: A Lesson from Kilimanjaro Clinicians.

B Mbwele, A Slot, Q De Mast, P Kweka, M Msuya, M Hulscher
{"title":"The Use of Guidelines for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Tanzania: A Lesson from Kilimanjaro Clinicians.","authors":"B Mbwele,&nbsp;A Slot,&nbsp;Q De Mast,&nbsp;P Kweka,&nbsp;M Msuya,&nbsp;M Hulscher","doi":"10.4103/2141-9248.181845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluations of the guidelines for the management of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI) Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Tanzania is scant.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of the current Tanzanian treatment guideline for the management lower respiratory tract infection.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A descriptive cross sectional study in 11 hospitals of different levels in the Kilimanjaro region Data were collected from May 2012 to July 2012 by semi-structured interview for clinicians using 2 dummy cases for practical assessment. Data were analyzed by STATA v11 (StataCorp, TX, USA). Qualitative narratives from the interviews were translated, transcribed then coded by colors into meaningful themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A variety of principles for diagnosing and managing LRTI were demonstrated by 53 clinicians of Kilimanjaro. For the awareness, 67.9% (36/53) clinicians knew their responsibility to use Standard Treatment Guideline for managing LRTI. The content derived from Standard Treatment Guideline could be cited by 11.3% of clinicians (6/53) however they all showed concern of gaps in the guideline. Previous training in the management of patients with LRTI was reported by 25.9% (14/53), majority were pulmonary TB related. Correct microorganisms causing different forms of LRTI were mentioned by 11.3% (6/53). Exact cause of Atypical pneumonia and Q fever as an example was stated by 13.0% (7/53) from whom the need of developing the guideline for LRTI was explicitly elaborated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current guidelines have not been used effectively for the management of LRTI in Tanzania. There is a need to review its content for the current practical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":8186,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","volume":"6 2","pages":"100-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8b/f3/AMHSR-6-100.PMC4866362.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.181845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluations of the guidelines for the management of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI) Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Tanzania is scant.

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of the current Tanzanian treatment guideline for the management lower respiratory tract infection.

Subjects and methods: A descriptive cross sectional study in 11 hospitals of different levels in the Kilimanjaro region Data were collected from May 2012 to July 2012 by semi-structured interview for clinicians using 2 dummy cases for practical assessment. Data were analyzed by STATA v11 (StataCorp, TX, USA). Qualitative narratives from the interviews were translated, transcribed then coded by colors into meaningful themes.

Results: A variety of principles for diagnosing and managing LRTI were demonstrated by 53 clinicians of Kilimanjaro. For the awareness, 67.9% (36/53) clinicians knew their responsibility to use Standard Treatment Guideline for managing LRTI. The content derived from Standard Treatment Guideline could be cited by 11.3% of clinicians (6/53) however they all showed concern of gaps in the guideline. Previous training in the management of patients with LRTI was reported by 25.9% (14/53), majority were pulmonary TB related. Correct microorganisms causing different forms of LRTI were mentioned by 11.3% (6/53). Exact cause of Atypical pneumonia and Q fever as an example was stated by 13.0% (7/53) from whom the need of developing the guideline for LRTI was explicitly elaborated.

Conclusion: The current guidelines have not been used effectively for the management of LRTI in Tanzania. There is a need to review its content for the current practical use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用指南下呼吸道感染在坦桑尼亚:从乞力马扎罗山临床医生的教训。
背景:对撒哈拉以南非洲,特别是坦桑尼亚的下呼吸道感染(LRTI)管理指南的评估不足。目的:本研究的目的是评估当前坦桑尼亚治疗指南下呼吸道感染管理的有效性。研究对象与方法:对乞力马扎罗山地区11家各级医院进行描述性横断面研究,数据采集时间为2012年5月至2012年7月,采用半结构化访谈的方式对临床医生进行数据采集,采用2例虚拟病例进行实际评估。数据采用STATA v11 (StataCorp, TX, USA)进行分析。采访中的定性叙述被翻译、转录,然后用颜色编码成有意义的主题。结果:53名乞力马扎罗山临床医生展示了多种诊断和治疗下呼吸道感染的原则。67.9%(36/53)的临床医生知道他们有责任使用标准治疗指南来管理LRTI。11.3%的临床医生(6/53)能够引用标准治疗指南的内容,但他们都对指南中的空白表示担忧。25.9%(14/53)的患者曾接受过LRTI患者管理方面的培训,其中大多数与肺结核相关。引起不同形式LRTI的正确微生物占11.3%(6/53)。以非典型肺炎和Q热的确切病因为例,有13.0%(7/53)的人明确阐述了制定LRTI指南的必要性。结论:目前的指南尚未有效地用于坦桑尼亚LRTI的管理。为了当前的实际应用,有必要对其内容进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信