The Gibson-Ashby model for additively manufactured metal lattice materials: Its theoretical basis, limitations and new insights from remedies

IF 12.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Haozhang Zhong , Tingting Song , Chuanwei Li , Raj Das , Jianfeng Gu , Ma Qian
{"title":"The Gibson-Ashby model for additively manufactured metal lattice materials: Its theoretical basis, limitations and new insights from remedies","authors":"Haozhang Zhong ,&nbsp;Tingting Song ,&nbsp;Chuanwei Li ,&nbsp;Raj Das ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Gu ,&nbsp;Ma Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.cossms.2023.101081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Gibson-Ashby (G-A) model has been instrumental in the design of additively manufactured (AM-ed) metal lattice materials or mechanical metamaterials. The first part of this work reviews the proposition and formulation of the G-A model and emphasizes that the G-A model is only applicable to low-density lattice materials with strut length-to-diameter ratios greater than 5. The second part evaluates the applicability of the G-A model to AM-ed metal lattice materials and reveals the fundamental disconnections between them. The third part assesses the deformation mechanisms of AM-ed metal lattices in relation to their strut length-to-diameter ratios and identifies that AM-ed metal lattices deform by concurrent bending, stretching, and shear, rather than just stretching or bending considered by the G-A model. Consequently, mechanical property models coupling stretching, bending and shear deformation mechanisms are developed for various lattice materials, which show high congruence with experimental data. The last part discusses new insights obtained from these remedies into the design of strong and stiff metal lattices. In particular, we recommend that the use of inclined struts be avoided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":295,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 101081"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359028623000268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Gibson-Ashby (G-A) model has been instrumental in the design of additively manufactured (AM-ed) metal lattice materials or mechanical metamaterials. The first part of this work reviews the proposition and formulation of the G-A model and emphasizes that the G-A model is only applicable to low-density lattice materials with strut length-to-diameter ratios greater than 5. The second part evaluates the applicability of the G-A model to AM-ed metal lattice materials and reveals the fundamental disconnections between them. The third part assesses the deformation mechanisms of AM-ed metal lattices in relation to their strut length-to-diameter ratios and identifies that AM-ed metal lattices deform by concurrent bending, stretching, and shear, rather than just stretching or bending considered by the G-A model. Consequently, mechanical property models coupling stretching, bending and shear deformation mechanisms are developed for various lattice materials, which show high congruence with experimental data. The last part discusses new insights obtained from these remedies into the design of strong and stiff metal lattices. In particular, we recommend that the use of inclined struts be avoided.

增材制造金属晶格材料的Gibson-Ashby模型:理论基础、局限性和补救的新见解
Gibson-Ashby (G-A)模型在增材制造(AM-ed)金属晶格材料或机械超材料的设计中发挥了重要作用。本文第一部分回顾了G-A模型的命题和公式,强调G-A模型仅适用于支撑长径比大于5的低密度点阵材料。第二部分评估了G-A模型对AM-ed金属晶格材料的适用性,并揭示了它们之间的基本脱节。第三部分评估了AM-ed金属晶格的变形机制,与它们的支撑长度与直径比有关,并确定了AM-ed金属晶格的变形是通过同时弯曲、拉伸和剪切进行的,而不仅仅是G-A模型所考虑的拉伸或弯曲。建立了多种晶格材料的拉伸、弯曲和剪切耦合力学性能模型,与实验数据具有较高的一致性。最后一部分讨论了从这些补救措施中获得的新见解,以设计坚固和坚硬的金属晶格。特别是,我们建议避免使用倾斜支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science
Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
21.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Title: Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science Journal Overview: Aims to provide a snapshot of the latest research and advances in materials science Publishes six issues per year, each containing reviews covering exciting and developing areas of materials science Each issue comprises 2-3 sections of reviews commissioned by international researchers who are experts in their fields Provides materials scientists with the opportunity to stay informed about current developments in their own and related areas of research Promotes cross-fertilization of ideas across an increasingly interdisciplinary field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信