Use of hierarchical models to analyze European trends in congenital anomaly prevalence

Q Medicine
Alana Cavadino, David Prieto-Merino, Marie-Claude Addor, Larraitz Arriola, Fabrizio Bianchi, Elizabeth Draper, Ester Garne, Ruth Greenlees, Martin Haeusler, Babak Khoshnood, Jenny Kurinczuk, Bob McDonnell, Vera Nelen, Mary O'Mahony, Hanitra Randrianaivo, Judith Rankin, Anke Rissmann, David Tucker, Christine Verellen-Dumoulin, Hermien de Walle, Diana Wellesley, Joan K. Morris
{"title":"Use of hierarchical models to analyze European trends in congenital anomaly prevalence","authors":"Alana Cavadino,&nbsp;David Prieto-Merino,&nbsp;Marie-Claude Addor,&nbsp;Larraitz Arriola,&nbsp;Fabrizio Bianchi,&nbsp;Elizabeth Draper,&nbsp;Ester Garne,&nbsp;Ruth Greenlees,&nbsp;Martin Haeusler,&nbsp;Babak Khoshnood,&nbsp;Jenny Kurinczuk,&nbsp;Bob McDonnell,&nbsp;Vera Nelen,&nbsp;Mary O'Mahony,&nbsp;Hanitra Randrianaivo,&nbsp;Judith Rankin,&nbsp;Anke Rissmann,&nbsp;David Tucker,&nbsp;Christine Verellen-Dumoulin,&nbsp;Hermien de Walle,&nbsp;Diana Wellesley,&nbsp;Joan K. Morris","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Surveillance of congenital anomalies is important to identify potential teratogens. Despite known associations between different anomalies, current surveillance methods examine trends within each subgroup separately. We aimed to evaluate whether hierarchical statistical methods that combine information from several subgroups simultaneously would enhance current surveillance methods using data collected by EUROCAT, a European network of population-based congenital anomaly registries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ten-year trends (2003 to 2012) in 18 EUROCAT registries over 11 countries were analyzed for the following groups of anomalies: neural tube defects, congenital heart defects, digestive system, and chromosomal anomalies. Hierarchical Poisson regression models that combined related subgroups together according to EUROCAT's hierarchy of subgroup coding were applied. Results from hierarchical models were compared with those from Poisson models that consider each congenital anomaly separately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Hierarchical models gave similar results as those obtained when considering each anomaly subgroup in a separate analysis. Hierarchical models that included only around three subgroups showed poor convergence and were generally found to be over-parameterized. Larger sets of anomaly subgroups were found to be too heterogeneous to group together in this way.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There were no substantial differences between independent analyses of each subgroup and hierarchical models when using the EUROCAT anomaly subgroups. Considering each anomaly separately, therefore, remains an appropriate method for the detection of potential changes in prevalence by surveillance systems. Hierarchical models do, however, remain an interesting alternative method of analysis when considering the risks of specific exposures in relation to the prevalence of congenital anomalies, which could be investigated in other studies. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:480–10, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23515","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Surveillance of congenital anomalies is important to identify potential teratogens. Despite known associations between different anomalies, current surveillance methods examine trends within each subgroup separately. We aimed to evaluate whether hierarchical statistical methods that combine information from several subgroups simultaneously would enhance current surveillance methods using data collected by EUROCAT, a European network of population-based congenital anomaly registries.

Methods

Ten-year trends (2003 to 2012) in 18 EUROCAT registries over 11 countries were analyzed for the following groups of anomalies: neural tube defects, congenital heart defects, digestive system, and chromosomal anomalies. Hierarchical Poisson regression models that combined related subgroups together according to EUROCAT's hierarchy of subgroup coding were applied. Results from hierarchical models were compared with those from Poisson models that consider each congenital anomaly separately.

Results

Hierarchical models gave similar results as those obtained when considering each anomaly subgroup in a separate analysis. Hierarchical models that included only around three subgroups showed poor convergence and were generally found to be over-parameterized. Larger sets of anomaly subgroups were found to be too heterogeneous to group together in this way.

Conclusion

There were no substantial differences between independent analyses of each subgroup and hierarchical models when using the EUROCAT anomaly subgroups. Considering each anomaly separately, therefore, remains an appropriate method for the detection of potential changes in prevalence by surveillance systems. Hierarchical models do, however, remain an interesting alternative method of analysis when considering the risks of specific exposures in relation to the prevalence of congenital anomalies, which could be investigated in other studies. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:480–10, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Image

使用分层模型分析欧洲先天性异常流行趋势
背景先天性异常的监测对于发现潜在的致畸物是很重要的。尽管已知不同异常之间存在关联,但目前的监测方法分别检查每个亚组内的趋势。我们的目的是评估同时结合几个亚组信息的分层统计方法是否会增强目前使用EUROCAT(一个基于人口的欧洲先天性异常登记处网络)收集的数据的监测方法。方法分析11个国家18个EUROCAT登记中心2003 - 2012年10年的趋势,包括神经管缺陷、先天性心脏缺陷、消化系统和染色体异常。采用分层泊松回归模型,根据EUROCAT的子组编码层次将相关子组组合在一起。将分层模型的结果与分别考虑每种先天性异常的泊松模型的结果进行比较。结果分层模型得到的结果与单独分析每个异常子组时得到的结果相似。只包括大约三个子组的分层模型表现出较差的收敛性,并且通常被发现是过度参数化的。较大的异常亚群集合被发现过于异质而不能以这种方式组合在一起。结论在使用EUROCAT异常亚组时,各亚组的独立分析与分层模型之间无显著差异。因此,单独考虑每种异常,仍然是监测系统检测患病率潜在变化的适当方法。然而,当考虑到与先天性异常患病率相关的特定暴露风险时,分层模型仍然是一种有趣的替代分析方法,这可以在其他研究中进行调查。出生缺陷研究(A辑)106:480 - 10,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信