Management and outcomes of neonates with down syndrome admitted to neonatal units

Q Medicine
Jake P. Mann, Eugene Statnikov, Neena Modi, Nik Johnson, Anna Springett, Joan K. Morris
{"title":"Management and outcomes of neonates with down syndrome admitted to neonatal units","authors":"Jake P. Mann,&nbsp;Eugene Statnikov,&nbsp;Neena Modi,&nbsp;Nik Johnson,&nbsp;Anna Springett,&nbsp;Joan K. Morris","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neonates with Down syndrome have an increased risk of being admitted to a neonatal unit compared with unaffected neonates. We aimed to estimate the proportion of neonates with Down syndrome admitted to a neonatal unit and compare their management and outcomes with other neonatal admissions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Case–control study of neonates born from 2009 to 2011 admitted to 122 NHS Neonatal Units in England using data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register and the National Neonatal Research Database. For each neonate with Down syndrome, three neonates admitted to the same unit in the same month and born at the same gestation were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-six percent of neonates with Down syndrome were admitted to a neonatal unit. Boys were more likely to be admitted than girls (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–2.0). Neonates with Down syndrome required more intensive or high dependency care compared with unaffected neonates (37% vs. 27%. <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and stayed in neonatal units for longer (11 days vs. 5 days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). A total of 31% of neonates with Down syndrome required respiratory support compared with 22% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) of unaffected neonates, and 11% were discharged requiring oxygen supplementation compared with 3% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) of unaffected neonates. A total of 3% of neonates with Down syndrome died in a neonatal unit compared with 1% (<i>p</i> = 0.01) of unaffected neonates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Neonates with Down syndrome are more likely than unaffected neonates to be admitted to a neonatal unit, have a prolonged stay, and be discharged home on supplemental oxygen. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:468–474, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"106 6","pages":"468-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23513","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background

Neonates with Down syndrome have an increased risk of being admitted to a neonatal unit compared with unaffected neonates. We aimed to estimate the proportion of neonates with Down syndrome admitted to a neonatal unit and compare their management and outcomes with other neonatal admissions.

Methods

Case–control study of neonates born from 2009 to 2011 admitted to 122 NHS Neonatal Units in England using data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register and the National Neonatal Research Database. For each neonate with Down syndrome, three neonates admitted to the same unit in the same month and born at the same gestation were identified.

Results

Forty-six percent of neonates with Down syndrome were admitted to a neonatal unit. Boys were more likely to be admitted than girls (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–2.0). Neonates with Down syndrome required more intensive or high dependency care compared with unaffected neonates (37% vs. 27%. p < 0.01) and stayed in neonatal units for longer (11 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.01). A total of 31% of neonates with Down syndrome required respiratory support compared with 22% (p < 0.001) of unaffected neonates, and 11% were discharged requiring oxygen supplementation compared with 3% (p < 0.001) of unaffected neonates. A total of 3% of neonates with Down syndrome died in a neonatal unit compared with 1% (p = 0.01) of unaffected neonates.

Conclusion

Neonates with Down syndrome are more likely than unaffected neonates to be admitted to a neonatal unit, have a prolonged stay, and be discharged home on supplemental oxygen. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:468–474, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

入住新生儿病房的唐氏综合征新生儿的管理和结局
背景:与未受影响的新生儿相比,患有唐氏综合症的新生儿被送入新生儿病房的风险增加。我们的目的是估计唐氏综合征新生儿入住新生儿病房的比例,并将其管理和结果与其他新生儿入院进行比较。方法采用国家唐氏综合征细胞遗传学登记和国家新生儿研究数据库的数据,对2009年至2011年在英国122个NHS新生儿单位出生的新生儿进行病例对照研究。对于每一个患有唐氏综合症的新生儿,有三个在同一个月住在同一个病房、在同一个妊娠期出生的新生儿被确定。结果46%的唐氏综合征新生儿入住新生儿病房。男孩比女孩更容易被录取(优势比= 1.7;95%置信区间为1.4-2.0)。与未受影响的新生儿相比,患有唐氏综合症的新生儿需要更多的强化或高度依赖护理(37%对27%)。p & lt;0.01)并且在新生儿病房待的时间更长(11天vs. 5天,p <0.01)。共有31%的唐氏综合征新生儿需要呼吸支持,而22% (p <0.001), 11%的新生儿出院时需要补充氧气,而3% (p <0.001)。总共有3%的患有唐氏综合症的新生儿在新生儿病房死亡,而未患唐氏综合症的新生儿死亡率为1% (p = 0.01)。结论唐氏综合征新生儿比正常新生儿更容易入住新生儿病房,住院时间延长,出院时需补充氧气。出生缺陷研究(分册),2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信