Is advanced maternal age a risk factor for congenital heart disease?

Q Medicine
Kate E. Best, Judith Rankin
{"title":"Is advanced maternal age a risk factor for congenital heart disease?","authors":"Kate E. Best,&nbsp;Judith Rankin","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Studies have reported that advanced maternal age is a risk factor for congenital heart disease (CHD), but none of these have been performed in the United Kingdom. Currently, women in the United Kingdom are not referred for specialist fetal echocardiography based on maternal age alone. The aim of this study is to examine the association between maternal age at delivery and CHD prevalence in the North of England.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Singleton cases of CHD notified to the Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey and born between January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2013, were included. Cases with chromosomal anomalies were excluded. The relative risk (RR) of CHD according to maternal age at delivery was estimated using Poisson regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 4024 singleton cases of nonchromosomal CHD, giving a prevalence of 8.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.8–8.3) per 1000 live and stillbirths. There was no association between maternal age at delivery and CHD prevalence (<i>p</i> = 0.97), with no evidence of an increased risk of CHD in mothers aged ≥35 compared to aged 25 to 29 (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89–1.09). There were no significant associations between maternal age at delivery and severity III CHD (<i>p</i> = 0.84), severity II CHD (<i>p</i> = 0.74), or severity I CHD (<i>p</i> = 0.66), although there was a slight increased risk of severity I CHD in mothers aged ≥35 (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.83–1.95).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found little evidence that advanced maternal age is a risk factor for CHD. There is no evidence that women in the United Kingdom should be referred for specialist prenatal cardiac screening based on their age. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:461–467, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"106 6","pages":"461-467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23507","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Background

Studies have reported that advanced maternal age is a risk factor for congenital heart disease (CHD), but none of these have been performed in the United Kingdom. Currently, women in the United Kingdom are not referred for specialist fetal echocardiography based on maternal age alone. The aim of this study is to examine the association between maternal age at delivery and CHD prevalence in the North of England.

Methods

Singleton cases of CHD notified to the Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey and born between January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2013, were included. Cases with chromosomal anomalies were excluded. The relative risk (RR) of CHD according to maternal age at delivery was estimated using Poisson regression.

Results

There were 4024 singleton cases of nonchromosomal CHD, giving a prevalence of 8.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.8–8.3) per 1000 live and stillbirths. There was no association between maternal age at delivery and CHD prevalence (p = 0.97), with no evidence of an increased risk of CHD in mothers aged ≥35 compared to aged 25 to 29 (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89–1.09). There were no significant associations between maternal age at delivery and severity III CHD (p = 0.84), severity II CHD (p = 0.74), or severity I CHD (p = 0.66), although there was a slight increased risk of severity I CHD in mothers aged ≥35 (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 0.83–1.95).

Conclusion

We found little evidence that advanced maternal age is a risk factor for CHD. There is no evidence that women in the United Kingdom should be referred for specialist prenatal cardiac screening based on their age. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:461–467, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Image

高龄产妇是先天性心脏病的危险因素吗?
研究报道,高龄产妇是先天性心脏病(CHD)的一个危险因素,但这些研究在英国都没有进行过。目前,在英国,妇女不会仅根据母亲的年龄进行胎儿超声心动图检查。本研究的目的是研究英格兰北部产妇分娩年龄与冠心病患病率之间的关系。方法选取1998年1月1日至2013年12月31日出生的北方先天性异常调查报告的CHD单胎病例。排除有染色体异常的病例。用泊松回归估计产妇分娩年龄与冠心病的相对危险度(RR)。结果4024例单胎非染色体性冠心病,每1000例活产和死产患病率为8.1例(95%可信区间[CI], 7.8-8.3)。产妇分娩年龄与冠心病患病率之间没有关联(p = 0.97),没有证据表明年龄≥35岁的母亲患冠心病的风险比25 ~ 29岁的母亲高(RR = 0.99;95% ci, 0.89-1.09)。产妇分娩年龄与III级冠心病(p = 0.84)、II级冠心病(p = 0.74)或I级冠心病(p = 0.66)没有显著相关性,尽管年龄≥35岁的产妇患I级冠心病的风险略有增加(RR = 1.27;95% ci, 0.83-1.95)。结论没有证据表明高龄产妇是冠心病的危险因素。没有证据表明英国的妇女应该根据她们的年龄进行专门的产前心脏筛查。出生缺陷研究(A辑),2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信