Defining the Best Nasal Tip Projection among Iranian Women.

Plastic Surgery International Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-05-16 DOI:10.1155/2016/8549276
Alireza Mohebbi, Hesam Jahandideh, Zhaleh Faham, Morteza Jafari
{"title":"Defining the Best Nasal Tip Projection among Iranian Women.","authors":"Alireza Mohebbi,&nbsp;Hesam Jahandideh,&nbsp;Zhaleh Faham,&nbsp;Morteza Jafari","doi":"10.1155/2016/8549276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rhinoplasty is one of the most complicated aesthetic surgeries. One important factor in nasal profile analysis before surgery is the NTP (Nasal Tip Projection). There has been controversy over defining the best tip projection and due to cultural differences there is a need to find the best formulation for Iranian noses. We selected 50 randomized patients. Lateral nasal views were captured from all of the patients. In order to equalize the photos, all tip rotations changed first to 105. We selected four methods for measuring NTP (Goode, Crumley 1, Crumley 2, and Powell and Humphreys). Based on these methods NTP was shown in four pictures. A questionnaire was designed for rating the pictures. Questionnaires were filled in by 3 different groups: rhinoplasty surgeons, general people, and artists. A total of 73 questionnaires were filled in. The analysis and comparison were done. Crumley 2 is the best NTP measurement method from the surgeons' and artists' view. Goode is the method preferred by general people. Powell & Humphreys method seems to be the worst method from all 3 groups' view. It seems that general people prefer smaller noses, because projection in Goode method is almost less than Crumley 2. </p>","PeriodicalId":20105,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery International","volume":"2016 ","pages":"8549276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/8549276","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8549276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Rhinoplasty is one of the most complicated aesthetic surgeries. One important factor in nasal profile analysis before surgery is the NTP (Nasal Tip Projection). There has been controversy over defining the best tip projection and due to cultural differences there is a need to find the best formulation for Iranian noses. We selected 50 randomized patients. Lateral nasal views were captured from all of the patients. In order to equalize the photos, all tip rotations changed first to 105. We selected four methods for measuring NTP (Goode, Crumley 1, Crumley 2, and Powell and Humphreys). Based on these methods NTP was shown in four pictures. A questionnaire was designed for rating the pictures. Questionnaires were filled in by 3 different groups: rhinoplasty surgeons, general people, and artists. A total of 73 questionnaires were filled in. The analysis and comparison were done. Crumley 2 is the best NTP measurement method from the surgeons' and artists' view. Goode is the method preferred by general people. Powell & Humphreys method seems to be the worst method from all 3 groups' view. It seems that general people prefer smaller noses, because projection in Goode method is almost less than Crumley 2.

Abstract Image

定义伊朗女性最佳鼻尖突出。
鼻整形术是最复杂的美容手术之一。术前鼻部轮廓分析的一个重要因素是NTP(鼻尖投影)。关于鼻尖最佳凸出的定义一直存在争议,由于文化差异,有必要找到适合伊朗鼻子的最佳配方。我们随机选择了50名患者。采集所有患者的侧鼻视图。为了平衡照片,所有的尖端旋转首先改变为105。我们选择了四种方法来测量NTP (Goode, Crumley 1, Crumley 2, Powell and Humphreys)。根据这些方法,NTP显示在四张图中。设计了一份调查问卷对图片进行评分。问卷由三个不同的组填写:鼻整形外科医生,普通人和艺术家。总共填写了73份问卷。并进行了分析比较。从外科医生和艺术家的角度来看,Crumley 2是最佳的NTP测量方法。善良是一般人喜欢的方法。鲍威尔和汉弗莱斯的方法似乎是最糟糕的方法,从所有三组的观点来看。一般人似乎更喜欢小鼻子,因为Goode法的投影几乎小于Crumley 2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信