Single Versus Multi-visit Endodontic Treatment of Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: An in vivo Study with 1-year Evaluation.

G S Gill, A C Bhuyan, C Kalita, L Das, R Kataki, D Bhuyan
{"title":"Single Versus Multi-visit Endodontic Treatment of Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: An in vivo Study with 1-year Evaluation.","authors":"G S Gill,&nbsp;A C Bhuyan,&nbsp;C Kalita,&nbsp;L Das,&nbsp;R Kataki,&nbsp;D Bhuyan","doi":"10.4103/2141-9248.180265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apical periodontitis (AP) is one of the most prevalent diseases of the teeth. Treatment of AP is based on the removal of the cause, i.e., bacteria from the root canals. Achievement of adequate bacterial eradication in one appointment treatment remains a controversy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This prospective study was conducted with the objective to compare the periapical healing of teeth with AP treated in (a) single visit versus (b) two visits, either with or without Vitapex as an intracanal medicament.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Patients were selected randomly from the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Forty-three patients (81 teeth) met the inclusion criteria, i.e., AP (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) visible radiographically size ≥2 mm × 2 mm, not suffering from any immune-compromising disease, age between 16 and 65 years and tooth not accessed previously. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., single-visit group (Group 1), multi-visit group without any intracanal medicament (Group 2), and multi-visit group with Vitapex as interim intracanal medicament (Group 3). Comparison was done radiographically using periapical index (PAI). The primary outcome measure was the change in periapical radiolucency after 1 year assessed by PAI scores. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate differences between groups at baseline (immediate postoperative) and at the 12-month follow-up evaluation. Change in PAI score for each group from baseline to 12-month follow-up evaluation was tested with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The secondary outcome measures, proportion of teeth in each group that could be considered improved (decreased PAI score) or healed (PAI <2), were assessed with the Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference in periapical healing was found between three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After 1-year evaluation, no difference in periapical healing was found between single-visit treatment and multi-visit treatment groups with the given sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":8186,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/1e/AMHSR-6-19.PMC4849111.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.180265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Apical periodontitis (AP) is one of the most prevalent diseases of the teeth. Treatment of AP is based on the removal of the cause, i.e., bacteria from the root canals. Achievement of adequate bacterial eradication in one appointment treatment remains a controversy.

Aim: This prospective study was conducted with the objective to compare the periapical healing of teeth with AP treated in (a) single visit versus (b) two visits, either with or without Vitapex as an intracanal medicament.

Subjects and methods: Patients were selected randomly from the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Forty-three patients (81 teeth) met the inclusion criteria, i.e., AP (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) visible radiographically size ≥2 mm × 2 mm, not suffering from any immune-compromising disease, age between 16 and 65 years and tooth not accessed previously. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., single-visit group (Group 1), multi-visit group without any intracanal medicament (Group 2), and multi-visit group with Vitapex as interim intracanal medicament (Group 3). Comparison was done radiographically using periapical index (PAI). The primary outcome measure was the change in periapical radiolucency after 1 year assessed by PAI scores. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate differences between groups at baseline (immediate postoperative) and at the 12-month follow-up evaluation. Change in PAI score for each group from baseline to 12-month follow-up evaluation was tested with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The secondary outcome measures, proportion of teeth in each group that could be considered improved (decreased PAI score) or healed (PAI <2), were assessed with the Chi-square test.

Results: No statistically significant difference in periapical healing was found between three groups.

Conclusion: After 1-year evaluation, no difference in periapical healing was found between single-visit treatment and multi-visit treatment groups with the given sample size.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

根尖牙周炎牙根管治疗的单次与多次访问:一项为期1年的体内研究。
背景:根尖牙周炎(AP)是牙齿最常见的疾病之一。AP的治疗是基于去除病因,即从根管中去除细菌。在一次预约治疗中实现足够的细菌根除仍然存在争议。目的:本前瞻性研究的目的是比较(a)单次访问与(b)两次访问,使用或不使用Vitapex作为管内药物治疗AP的牙齿根尖周愈合。研究对象和方法:随机选择保守牙髓科患者。43例患者(81颗牙齿)符合纳入标准,即AP(有症状和无症状)x线片可见尺寸≥2mm × 2mm,无任何免疫损害疾病,年龄在16至65岁之间,以前没有接触过牙齿。患者随机分为三组,即单次就诊组(第1组)、多次就诊组(第2组)、多次就诊组(第3组),均不使用任何管内药物。采用尖周指数(PAI)进行影像学比较。主要观察指标是1年后经PAI评分评估的根尖周放射率的变化。使用Mann-Whitney u检验来评估各组在基线(术后即刻)和12个月随访评估时的差异。各组PAI评分从基线到12个月随访评估的变化采用Wilcoxon sign rank检验。次要结局指标,每组中可认为改善(PAI评分降低)或愈合的牙齿比例(PAI结果:三组间根尖周愈合无统计学差异。结论:经过1年的评估,在给定的样本量下,单次治疗组和多次治疗组在根尖周愈合方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信