Out of Sight, out of Mind? An Audit Which Proposes a Follow-Up and Management Pathway for Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Thrombosis Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-27 DOI:10.1155/2016/6538456
Caitriona Logan, Niamh O'Connell, John Kavanagh, Niall McEniff, Mark Ryan, Michael Guiney, Orla Seery, James O'Donnell, Kevin Ryan, Barry White
{"title":"Out of Sight, out of Mind? An Audit Which Proposes a Follow-Up and Management Pathway for Inferior Vena Cava Filters.","authors":"Caitriona Logan,&nbsp;Niamh O'Connell,&nbsp;John Kavanagh,&nbsp;Niall McEniff,&nbsp;Mark Ryan,&nbsp;Michael Guiney,&nbsp;Orla Seery,&nbsp;James O'Donnell,&nbsp;Kevin Ryan,&nbsp;Barry White","doi":"10.1155/2016/6538456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insertion of an IVC filter can be a safe and effective way to avoid PE in thrombosis patients who cannot be anticoagulated. If temporary filters are not promptly removed they can become difficult to remove, causing avoidable complications and often requiring lifelong warfarin. In this study, two sequential audits of retrieval of temporary IVC filters were conducted before and after the implementation of a coordinated management strategy for IVC filter follow-up. 33 filter placements were examined over a 15-month period (Group A). Following implementation of the strategy a comparable 15-month period in which 33 IVC filters were placed was audited (Group B). Following implementation, failed retrievals dropped from 15% to 9%. The number successfully retrieved did not change at 45%. The number made permanent from the outset following expert discussion increased from 12% to 39%. The number of filters with no attempted retrieval and no consultation about retrieval decreased from 27% to 9% (these patients were lost to follow-up with multiple contact attempts made). In Group B 100% of placed IVC filters were followed up appropriately. The proposed model is an easily implemented plan to avoid patient morbidity caused by temporary IVC filters made unintentionally permanent by loss to follow-up. </p>","PeriodicalId":75222,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis","volume":"2016 ","pages":"6538456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/6538456","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6538456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Insertion of an IVC filter can be a safe and effective way to avoid PE in thrombosis patients who cannot be anticoagulated. If temporary filters are not promptly removed they can become difficult to remove, causing avoidable complications and often requiring lifelong warfarin. In this study, two sequential audits of retrieval of temporary IVC filters were conducted before and after the implementation of a coordinated management strategy for IVC filter follow-up. 33 filter placements were examined over a 15-month period (Group A). Following implementation of the strategy a comparable 15-month period in which 33 IVC filters were placed was audited (Group B). Following implementation, failed retrievals dropped from 15% to 9%. The number successfully retrieved did not change at 45%. The number made permanent from the outset following expert discussion increased from 12% to 39%. The number of filters with no attempted retrieval and no consultation about retrieval decreased from 27% to 9% (these patients were lost to follow-up with multiple contact attempts made). In Group B 100% of placed IVC filters were followed up appropriately. The proposed model is an easily implemented plan to avoid patient morbidity caused by temporary IVC filters made unintentionally permanent by loss to follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

眼不见,心不烦?下腔静脉过滤器的审计及后续处理途径。
对于不能抗凝治疗的血栓患者,置入下腔静脉滤过器是一种安全有效的避免PE的方法。如果不及时清除临时过滤器,它们会变得难以清除,导致可避免的并发症,通常需要终身使用华法林。在本研究中,在实施IVC过滤器随访协调管理策略之前和之后,对临时IVC过滤器的检索进行了两次连续审计。在15个月的时间内检查了33个过滤器的放置情况(a组)。在实施该策略后的15个月内,对33个IVC过滤器进行了审计(B组)。实施后,失败的检索从15%下降到9%。成功检索的数量保持在45%不变。经过专家讨论,从一开始就被定为永久性的人数从12%增加到39%。未尝试取取和未咨询取取的患者数量从27%下降到9%(这些患者因多次接触尝试而失去随访)。B组对100%放置的IVC滤器进行适当随访。所提出的模型是一个易于实施的计划,以避免由于失去随访而使临时IVC过滤器无意中成为永久性的患者发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信