The Meaning of 'Dining': The Social Organization of Food in Long-term Care.

Food studies Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Ruth Lowndes, Pat Armstrong, Tamara Daly
{"title":"The Meaning of 'Dining': The Social Organization of Food in Long-term Care.","authors":"Ruth Lowndes,&nbsp;Pat Armstrong,&nbsp;Tamara Daly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the social organization of food provision in publicly funded and regulated long-term care facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observations were conducted, along with 90 interviews with residents, families, and health providers in two Southern Ontario sites using rapid site-switching ethnography within a feminist political economy framework as part of an international, interdisciplinary study investigating healthy ageing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food is purchased within a daily $7.80/per resident allotment, limiting high quality choices, which is further problematized by privatization of food services. Funding restrictions also result in low staffing levels, creating tensions in aligning with other Ministry mandated tasks such as bathing, and documenting: competing demands often lead to rushed meals. Regulations, primarily set in response to scandals and to ensure appropriate measured nutrition, reinforce the problem. Further, regulations regarding set meal times result in lack of resident agency, which is compounded by fixed menu options and seating arrangements in one common dining room. Rather than being viewed as an important part of resident socialization, food is reduced to a medicalized task, organized within a climate of cost-containment.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Findings warrant Ministry financial support for additional staff and for food provision. Policy changes are also required to give primacy to this population's quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":89925,"journal":{"name":"Food studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"19-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4830688/pdf/nihms5005.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the social organization of food provision in publicly funded and regulated long-term care facilities.

Methods: Observations were conducted, along with 90 interviews with residents, families, and health providers in two Southern Ontario sites using rapid site-switching ethnography within a feminist political economy framework as part of an international, interdisciplinary study investigating healthy ageing.

Results: Food is purchased within a daily $7.80/per resident allotment, limiting high quality choices, which is further problematized by privatization of food services. Funding restrictions also result in low staffing levels, creating tensions in aligning with other Ministry mandated tasks such as bathing, and documenting: competing demands often lead to rushed meals. Regulations, primarily set in response to scandals and to ensure appropriate measured nutrition, reinforce the problem. Further, regulations regarding set meal times result in lack of resident agency, which is compounded by fixed menu options and seating arrangements in one common dining room. Rather than being viewed as an important part of resident socialization, food is reduced to a medicalized task, organized within a climate of cost-containment.

Implications: Findings warrant Ministry financial support for additional staff and for food provision. Policy changes are also required to give primacy to this population's quality of life.

“用餐”的意义:长期护理中食物的社会组织。
目的:探讨公办和监管的长期护理机构食品供应的社会组织。方法:在女权主义政治经济学框架下,采用快速站点切换人种学作为调查健康老龄化的国际跨学科研究的一部分,对安大略省南部两个地点的居民、家庭和卫生服务提供者进行了90次访谈和观察。结果:粮食是在每人每日7.80美元的分配范围内购买的,限制了高质量的选择,粮食服务私有化进一步造成问题。资金限制也导致人员编制水平低,在与该部规定的其他任务(如洗澡和记录)保持一致方面造成紧张局势:相互竞争的需求往往导致匆忙用餐。主要是为了应对丑闻和确保适当衡量营养而制定的法规加剧了这一问题。此外,关于固定用餐时间的规定导致缺乏驻地机构,而固定的菜单选择和在一个公共餐厅的座位安排使情况更加复杂。食物不再被视为居民社会化的重要组成部分,而是被简化为一项医疗任务,在成本控制的环境下组织起来。影响:调查结果要求该部为增加工作人员和提供粮食提供财政支助。还需要改变政策,把这些人口的生活质量放在首位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信