Confounding of the Comparative Safety of Prenatal Opioid Agonist Therapy.

Journal of addiction research & therapy Pub Date : 2015-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-12-31 DOI:10.4172/2155-6105.1000252
Susan B Brogly, Kristen A Hahn, Sonia Hernandez Diaz, Martha Werler
{"title":"Confounding of the Comparative Safety of Prenatal Opioid Agonist Therapy.","authors":"Susan B Brogly, Kristen A Hahn, Sonia Hernandez Diaz, Martha Werler","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prenatal opioid agonist therapy with methadone or buprenorphine prevents maternal illicit opioid use and withdrawal and improves pregnancy outcomes compared to heroin use alone. Historically, methadone has been the first-line opioid agonist therapy for pregnant opioid dependent women; in recent years buprenorphine has become first-line treatment for some opioid dependent pregnant women. While there is some evidence of better outcomes in neonates exposed to buprenorphine vs. methadone, the effect of confounding from differences in women who use buprenorphine and methadone has not been carefully examined in most studies. This review explores mechanisms by which confounding can arise in measuring associations between prenatal buprenorphine vs. methadone exposure on neonatal outcomes using a graphical approach, directed acyclic graphs. The goal of this paper is to facilitate better understanding of the factors influencing neonatal abstinence syndrome and accurate assessment of the comparative safety of opioid agonist therapies on the neonate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction research & therapy","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4991778/pdf/nihms763917.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prenatal opioid agonist therapy with methadone or buprenorphine prevents maternal illicit opioid use and withdrawal and improves pregnancy outcomes compared to heroin use alone. Historically, methadone has been the first-line opioid agonist therapy for pregnant opioid dependent women; in recent years buprenorphine has become first-line treatment for some opioid dependent pregnant women. While there is some evidence of better outcomes in neonates exposed to buprenorphine vs. methadone, the effect of confounding from differences in women who use buprenorphine and methadone has not been carefully examined in most studies. This review explores mechanisms by which confounding can arise in measuring associations between prenatal buprenorphine vs. methadone exposure on neonatal outcomes using a graphical approach, directed acyclic graphs. The goal of this paper is to facilitate better understanding of the factors influencing neonatal abstinence syndrome and accurate assessment of the comparative safety of opioid agonist therapies on the neonate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

产前阿片类受体激动剂治疗的比较安全性混淆。
与单纯使用海洛因相比,产前使用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡进行阿片类药物激动剂治疗可预防孕产妇非法使用阿片类药物和戒断,并改善妊娠结局。一直以来,美沙酮是阿片类药物依赖孕妇的一线阿片类药物激动剂疗法;近年来,丁丙诺啡已成为一些阿片类药物依赖孕妇的一线疗法。虽然有证据表明,接受丁丙诺啡治疗的新生儿比接受美沙酮治疗的新生儿有更好的预后,但大多数研究都没有仔细研究使用丁丙诺啡和美沙酮的妇女的差异所产生的混杂效应。本综述采用有向无环图这种图形方法,探讨了在测量产前丁丙诺啡与美沙酮暴露对新生儿结局的关联时可能产生混杂的机制。本文旨在促进更好地理解新生儿戒断综合征的影响因素,并准确评估阿片类激动剂疗法对新生儿的安全性比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信