Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts.

IF 2.4 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Fly Pub Date : 2017-01-02 Epub Date: 2016-08-19 DOI:10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998
Alejandra Perez-Leanos, Mariana Ramirez Loustalot-Laclette, Nestor Nazario-Yepiz, Therese Ann Markow
{"title":"Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts.","authors":"Alejandra Perez-Leanos,&nbsp;Mariana Ramirez Loustalot-Laclette,&nbsp;Nestor Nazario-Yepiz,&nbsp;Therese Ann Markow","doi":"10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Only two parasite interactions are known for Drosophila to date: Allantonematid nematodes associated with mycophagous Drosophilids and the ectoparasitic mite Macrocheles subbadius with the Sonoran Desert endemic Drosophila nigrospiracula. Unlike the nematode-Drosophila association, breadth of mite parasitism on Drosophila species is unknown. As M. subbadius is a generalist, parasitism of additional Drosophilids is expected. We determined the extent and distribution of mite parasitism in nature Drosophilids collected in Mexico and southern California. Thirteen additional species of Drosophilids were infested. Interestingly, 10 belong to the repleta species group of the subgenus Drosophila, despite the fact that the majority of flies collected were of the subgenus Sophophora. In all cases but 2, the associated mites were M. subbadius. Drosophila hexastigma was found to have not only M. subbadius, but another Mesostigmatid mite, Paragarmania bakeri, as well. One D. hydei was also found to have a mite from genus Lasioseius attached. In both choice and no-choice experiments, mites were more attracted to repleta group species than to Sophophoran. The extent of mite parasitism clearly is much broader than previously reported and suggests a host bias mediated either by mite preference and/or some mechanism of resistance in particular Drosophilid lineages.</p>","PeriodicalId":12128,"journal":{"name":"Fly","volume":"11 1","pages":"10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fly","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19336934.2016.1222998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Only two parasite interactions are known for Drosophila to date: Allantonematid nematodes associated with mycophagous Drosophilids and the ectoparasitic mite Macrocheles subbadius with the Sonoran Desert endemic Drosophila nigrospiracula. Unlike the nematode-Drosophila association, breadth of mite parasitism on Drosophila species is unknown. As M. subbadius is a generalist, parasitism of additional Drosophilids is expected. We determined the extent and distribution of mite parasitism in nature Drosophilids collected in Mexico and southern California. Thirteen additional species of Drosophilids were infested. Interestingly, 10 belong to the repleta species group of the subgenus Drosophila, despite the fact that the majority of flies collected were of the subgenus Sophophora. In all cases but 2, the associated mites were M. subbadius. Drosophila hexastigma was found to have not only M. subbadius, but another Mesostigmatid mite, Paragarmania bakeri, as well. One D. hydei was also found to have a mite from genus Lasioseius attached. In both choice and no-choice experiments, mites were more attracted to repleta group species than to Sophophoran. The extent of mite parasitism clearly is much broader than previously reported and suggests a host bias mediated either by mite preference and/or some mechanism of resistance in particular Drosophilid lineages.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外寄生螨及其寄主果蝇。
迄今为止,只有两种寄生虫与果蝇的相互作用是已知的:与分枝性果蝇相关的异囊线虫线虫和与索诺兰沙漠特有的黑螺旋体果蝇相关的外寄生螨。与线虫-果蝇的关联不同,螨虫寄生在果蝇上的广度是未知的。由于该果蝇是一种多面手,因此预计会有其他果蝇寄生。我们测定了在墨西哥和南加州采集的自然果蝇中螨寄生的程度和分布。另外还有13种果蝇被侵染。有趣的是,其中10只属于果蝇亚属的补充种组,尽管事实上收集到的大多数果蝇都属于果蝇亚属。除2例外,其余病例伴发螨均为次阴螨。在六柱头果蝇中,不仅发现有亚badius螨,还发现了另一种中柱头螨bakeri Paragarmania。一只海蚊还被发现附着了一只Lasioseius属的螨。在有选择和无选择实验中,螨虫更容易被填饱的类群所吸引,而不是被Sophophoran所吸引。螨虫寄生的范围显然比以前报道的要广泛得多,这表明在特定的果蝇谱系中,螨虫偏好和/或某些抗性机制介导了宿主偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fly
Fly 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fly is the first international peer-reviewed journal to focus on Drosophila research. Fly covers a broad range of biological sub-disciplines, ranging from developmental biology and organogenesis to sensory neurobiology, circadian rhythm and learning and memory, to sex determination, evolutionary biology and speciation. We strive to become the “to go” resource for every researcher working with Drosophila by providing a forum where the specific interests of the Drosophila community can be discussed. With the advance of molecular technologies that enable researchers to manipulate genes and their functions in many other organisms, Fly is now also publishing papers that use other insect model systems used to investigate important biological questions. Fly offers a variety of papers, including Original Research Articles, Methods and Technical Advances, Brief Communications, Reviews and Meeting Reports. In addition, Fly also features two unconventional types of contributions, Counterpoints and Extra View articles. Counterpoints are opinion pieces that critically discuss controversial papers questioning current paradigms, whether justified or not. Extra View articles, which generally are solicited by Fly editors, provide authors of important forthcoming papers published elsewhere an opportunity to expand on their original findings and discuss the broader impact of their discovery. Extra View authors are strongly encouraged to complement their published observations with additional data not included in the original paper or acquired subsequently.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信