A Mechanistic Neural Field Theory of How Anesthesia Suppresses Consciousness: Synaptic Drive Dynamics, Bifurcations, Attractors, and Partial State Equipartitioning.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience
Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2015-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-10-05 DOI:10.1186/s13408-015-0032-7
Saing Paul Hou, Wassim M Haddad, Nader Meskin, James M Bailey
{"title":"A Mechanistic Neural Field Theory of How Anesthesia Suppresses Consciousness: Synaptic Drive Dynamics, Bifurcations, Attractors, and Partial State Equipartitioning.","authors":"Saing Paul Hou,&nbsp;Wassim M Haddad,&nbsp;Nader Meskin,&nbsp;James M Bailey","doi":"10.1186/s13408-015-0032-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the advances in biochemistry, molecular biology, and neurochemistry there has been impressive progress in understanding the molecular properties of anesthetic agents. However, there has been little focus on how the molecular properties of anesthetic agents lead to the observed macroscopic property that defines the anesthetic state, that is, lack of responsiveness to noxious stimuli. In this paper, we use dynamical system theory to develop a mechanistic mean field model for neural activity to study the abrupt transition from consciousness to unconsciousness as the concentration of the anesthetic agent increases. The proposed synaptic drive firing-rate model predicts the conscious-unconscious transition as the applied anesthetic concentration increases, where excitatory neural activity is characterized by a Poincaré-Andronov-Hopf bifurcation with the awake state transitioning to a stable limit cycle and then subsequently to an asymptotically stable unconscious equilibrium state. Furthermore, we address the more general question of synchronization and partial state equipartitioning of neural activity without mean field assumptions. This is done by focusing on a postulated subset of inhibitory neurons that are not themselves connected to other inhibitory neurons. Finally, several numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the different aspects of the proposed theory. </p>","PeriodicalId":54271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13408-015-0032-7","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-015-0032-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the advances in biochemistry, molecular biology, and neurochemistry there has been impressive progress in understanding the molecular properties of anesthetic agents. However, there has been little focus on how the molecular properties of anesthetic agents lead to the observed macroscopic property that defines the anesthetic state, that is, lack of responsiveness to noxious stimuli. In this paper, we use dynamical system theory to develop a mechanistic mean field model for neural activity to study the abrupt transition from consciousness to unconsciousness as the concentration of the anesthetic agent increases. The proposed synaptic drive firing-rate model predicts the conscious-unconscious transition as the applied anesthetic concentration increases, where excitatory neural activity is characterized by a Poincaré-Andronov-Hopf bifurcation with the awake state transitioning to a stable limit cycle and then subsequently to an asymptotically stable unconscious equilibrium state. Furthermore, we address the more general question of synchronization and partial state equipartitioning of neural activity without mean field assumptions. This is done by focusing on a postulated subset of inhibitory neurons that are not themselves connected to other inhibitory neurons. Finally, several numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the different aspects of the proposed theory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

麻醉如何抑制意识的机械性神经场理论:突触驱动动力学、分岔、吸引子和部分状态均分。
随着生物化学、分子生物学和神经化学的进步,在了解麻醉剂的分子特性方面取得了令人印象深刻的进展。然而,很少有人关注麻醉剂的分子特性如何导致观察到的定义麻醉状态的宏观特性,即对有害刺激缺乏反应。本文运用动力系统理论建立了神经活动的机械平均场模型,研究了当麻醉药浓度增加时从意识到无意识的突然转变。所提出的突触驱动发射速率模型预测了随着麻醉浓度的增加,神经兴奋性活动的特征是poincar - andronov - hopf分岔,清醒状态过渡到稳定的极限环,然后随后过渡到渐进稳定的无意识平衡状态。此外,我们在没有平均场假设的情况下解决了神经活动的同步和部分状态均分的更一般的问题。这是通过关注一个假设的抑制神经元子集来完成的,这些神经元本身与其他抑制神经元没有联系。最后,给出了几个数值实验来说明所提出理论的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience Neuroscience-Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience (JMN) publishes research articles on the mathematical modeling and analysis of all areas of neuroscience, i.e., the study of the nervous system and its dysfunctions. The focus is on using mathematics as the primary tool for elucidating the fundamental mechanisms responsible for experimentally observed behaviours in neuroscience at all relevant scales, from the molecular world to that of cognition. The aim is to publish work that uses advanced mathematical techniques to illuminate these questions. It publishes full length original papers, rapid communications and review articles. Papers that combine theoretical results supported by convincing numerical experiments are especially encouraged. Papers that introduce and help develop those new pieces of mathematical theory which are likely to be relevant to future studies of the nervous system in general and the human brain in particular are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信