XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer in Chinese.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-07-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Shuren Guo, Xiaohuan Mao, Liang Ming
{"title":"XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer in Chinese.","authors":"Shuren Guo,&nbsp;Xiaohuan Mao,&nbsp;Liang Ming","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with Breast cancer (BC) risk in Asians, but the results have been inconsistent. We therefore performed the present meta-analysis to explore the relationship in detail.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Reported studies were searched from 1990 to October 15, 2014 in PubMed and Wan fang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 13 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 4984 BC cases and 5744 controls in dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln), recessive (ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln), and co-dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln) inheritance models. The total odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and STATE 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, significantly increased BC risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.08, 1.58]; recessive model: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81]; codominant model: OR = 2.52, 95% CI: [1.38, 4.60]) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified analyses, no association was found between Arg399Gln polymorphism and BC risk in Chinese fewer than three hereditary models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with increased Breast cancer risk among Asians, except Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 7","pages":"10429-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565216/pdf/ijcem0008-10429.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A number of studies have been conducted to explore the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms with Breast cancer (BC) risk in Asians, but the results have been inconsistent. We therefore performed the present meta-analysis to explore the relationship in detail.

Materials and methods: Reported studies were searched from 1990 to October 15, 2014 in PubMed and Wan fang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 13 published case-control studies fitting our eligibility criteria. These studies involved XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms in 4984 BC cases and 5744 controls in dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln), recessive (ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln), and co-dominant (ArgArg vs. GlnGln) inheritance models. The total odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated and analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and STATE 12.

Results: Overall, significantly increased BC risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.08, 1.58]; recessive model: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81]; codominant model: OR = 2.52, 95% CI: [1.38, 4.60]) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified analyses, no association was found between Arg399Gln polymorphism and BC risk in Chinese fewer than three hereditary models.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with increased Breast cancer risk among Asians, except Chinese population.

中国人乳腺癌与XRCC1 Arg399Gln多态性无关
背景:已经进行了许多研究来探索XRCC1多态性与亚洲人乳腺癌(BC)风险的关系,但结果并不一致。因此,我们进行了本荟萃分析来详细探讨这种关系。材料和方法:检索PubMed和万方医学在线1990年至2014年10月15日所报道的研究。我们对符合我们入选标准的13项已发表的病例对照研究进行了荟萃分析。这些研究涉及4984例BC病例和5744例对照中显性(ArgArg vs. GlnGln+ArgGln)、隐性(ArgGln+ArgArg vs. GlnGln)和共显性(ArgArg vs. GlnGln)遗传模型的XRCC1 Arg399Gln多态性。通过Review Manager 5.2和STATE 12计算和分析总优势比(OR)和95% CI。结果:总体而言,在任何遗传模型中都观察到BC风险显著增加(优势模型:优势比[OR] = 1.31, 95%可信区间[CI] = [1.08, 1.58];隐性模型:OR = 0.63, 95% CI = [0.50, 0.81];共优势模型:OR = 2.52, 95% CI:[1.38, 4.60]),将所有符合条件的研究纳入meta分析。在进一步的分层分析中,在少于三个遗传模型的中国人中,没有发现Arg399Gln多态性与BC风险之间的关联。结论:我们的研究结果表明,XRCC1 Arg399Gln多态性可能与亚洲人乳腺癌风险增加有关,中国人群除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信