Finger Tendon Travel Associated with Sequential Trigger Nail Gun Use.

Brian Lowe, James Albers, Stephen Hudock, Edward Krieg
{"title":"Finger Tendon Travel Associated with Sequential Trigger Nail Gun Use.","authors":"Brian Lowe,&nbsp;James Albers,&nbsp;Stephen Hudock,&nbsp;Edward Krieg","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2012.742028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumatic nail guns used in wood framing are equipped with one of two triggering mechanisms. Sequential actuation triggers have been shown to be a safer alternative to contact actuation triggers because they reduce traumatic injury risk. However, the sequential actuation trigger must be depressed for each individual nail fired as opposed to the contact actuation trigger, which allows the trigger to be held depressed as nails are fired repeatedly by bumping the safety tip against the workpiece. As such, concerns have been raised about risks for cumulative trauma injury, and reduced productivity, due to repetitive finger motion with the sequential actuation trigger.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study developed a method to predict cumulative finger flexor tendon travel associated with the sequential actuation trigger nail gun from finger joint kinematics measured in the trigger actuation and productivity standards for wood-frame construction tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finger motions were measured from six users wearing an instrumented electrogoniometer glove in a simulation of two common framing tasks-wall building and flat nailing of material. Flexor tendon travel was calculated from the ensemble average kinematics for an individual nail fired.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finger flexor tendon travel was attributable mostly to proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joint motion. Tendon travel per nail fired appeared to be slightly greater for a wall-building task than a flat nailing task. The present study data, in combination with construction industry productivity standards, suggest that a high-production workday would be associated with less than 60 m/day cumulative tendon travel per worker (based on 1700 trigger presses/day).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and applications: </strong>These results suggest that exposure to finger tendon travel from sequential actuation trigger nail gun use may be below levels that have been previously associated with high musculoskeletal disorder risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"1 2","pages":"109-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2012.742028","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2012.742028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Pneumatic nail guns used in wood framing are equipped with one of two triggering mechanisms. Sequential actuation triggers have been shown to be a safer alternative to contact actuation triggers because they reduce traumatic injury risk. However, the sequential actuation trigger must be depressed for each individual nail fired as opposed to the contact actuation trigger, which allows the trigger to be held depressed as nails are fired repeatedly by bumping the safety tip against the workpiece. As such, concerns have been raised about risks for cumulative trauma injury, and reduced productivity, due to repetitive finger motion with the sequential actuation trigger.

Purpose: This study developed a method to predict cumulative finger flexor tendon travel associated with the sequential actuation trigger nail gun from finger joint kinematics measured in the trigger actuation and productivity standards for wood-frame construction tasks.

Methods: Finger motions were measured from six users wearing an instrumented electrogoniometer glove in a simulation of two common framing tasks-wall building and flat nailing of material. Flexor tendon travel was calculated from the ensemble average kinematics for an individual nail fired.

Results: Finger flexor tendon travel was attributable mostly to proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joint motion. Tendon travel per nail fired appeared to be slightly greater for a wall-building task than a flat nailing task. The present study data, in combination with construction industry productivity standards, suggest that a high-production workday would be associated with less than 60 m/day cumulative tendon travel per worker (based on 1700 trigger presses/day).

Conclusion and applications: These results suggest that exposure to finger tendon travel from sequential actuation trigger nail gun use may be below levels that have been previously associated with high musculoskeletal disorder risk.

手指肌腱移动与顺序触发钉枪使用有关。
背景:木框架中使用的气动钉枪配有两种触发机构之一。顺序触发已被证明是比接触式触发更安全的选择,因为它们降低了创伤性损伤的风险。然而,对于每一个单独的钉子,顺序驱动触发器必须被压下,而不是接触驱动触发器,接触驱动触发器允许触发器被压下,因为钉子被反复发射,通过碰撞安全尖端到工件上。因此,由于连续驱动触发器的手指重复运动,人们对累积创伤损伤和生产力降低的风险感到担忧。目的:本研究开发了一种方法,通过在木结构施工任务的触发驱动和生产力标准中测量的手指关节运动学来预测与顺序驱动触发钉枪相关的手指屈肌腱累积位移。方法:在模拟两种常见的框架任务-建墙和平钉材料时,测量了六名佩戴仪器式电眼计手套的用户的手指运动。从单个钉子发射的整体平均运动学中计算屈肌腱的行程。结果:指屈肌腱移动主要是指间关节近端和远端运动所致。在建墙任务中,每钉一次的肌腱移动似乎比平钉任务稍大。目前的研究数据,结合建筑行业的生产力标准,表明高产工作日将与每个工人少于60米/天的累计肌腱移动相关(基于1700个触发压力机/天)。结论和应用:这些结果表明,使用顺序驱动触发钉枪导致的手指肌腱移动暴露可能低于先前与高肌肉骨骼疾病风险相关的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信