Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Grounded Theory Research.

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Qualitative Report Pub Date : 2014-04-28
Claire Burke Draucker, Halima Al-Khattab, Dana D Hines, Jill Mazurczyk, Anne C Russell, Pam Shockey Stephenson, Shannon Draucker
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Grounded Theory Research.","authors":"Claire Burke Draucker,&nbsp;Halima Al-Khattab,&nbsp;Dana D Hines,&nbsp;Jill Mazurczyk,&nbsp;Anne C Russell,&nbsp;Pam Shockey Stephenson,&nbsp;Shannon Draucker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>National initiatives in the United States call for health research that addresses racial/ethnic disparities. Although grounded theory (GT) research has the potential to contribute much to the understanding of the health experiences of people of color, the extent to which it has contributed to health disparities research is unclear. In this article we describe a project in which we reviewed 44 GT studies published in Qualitative Health Research within the last five years. Using a framework proposed by Green, Creswell, Shope, and Clark (2007), we categorized the studies at one of four levels based on the status and significance afforded racial/ethnic diversity. Our results indicate that racial/ethnic diversity played a primary role in five studies, a complementary role in one study, a peripheral role in five studies, and an absent role in 33 studies. We suggest that GT research could contribute more to health disparities research if techniques were developed to better analyze the influence of race/ethnicity on health-related phenomena.</p>","PeriodicalId":51387,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577052/pdf/nihms-626934.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National initiatives in the United States call for health research that addresses racial/ethnic disparities. Although grounded theory (GT) research has the potential to contribute much to the understanding of the health experiences of people of color, the extent to which it has contributed to health disparities research is unclear. In this article we describe a project in which we reviewed 44 GT studies published in Qualitative Health Research within the last five years. Using a framework proposed by Green, Creswell, Shope, and Clark (2007), we categorized the studies at one of four levels based on the status and significance afforded racial/ethnic diversity. Our results indicate that racial/ethnic diversity played a primary role in five studies, a complementary role in one study, a peripheral role in five studies, and an absent role in 33 studies. We suggest that GT research could contribute more to health disparities research if techniques were developed to better analyze the influence of race/ethnicity on health-related phenomena.

扎根理论研究中的种族和民族多样性。
美国的国家倡议呼吁开展针对种族/民族差异的卫生研究。虽然扎根理论(GT)研究有可能对理解有色人种的健康经历做出很大贡献,但它对健康差异研究的贡献程度尚不清楚。在这篇文章中,我们描述了一个项目,在这个项目中,我们回顾了过去五年内发表在《定性健康研究》上的44项GT研究。使用Green, Creswell, Shope和Clark(2007)提出的框架,我们根据种族/民族多样性的地位和意义将研究分为四个层次之一。我们的研究结果表明,种族/民族多样性在5项研究中起主要作用,在1项研究中起补充作用,在5项研究中起次要作用,在33项研究中起缺席作用。我们建议,如果技术能够更好地分析种族/民族对健康相关现象的影响,GT研究可以为健康差异研究做出更大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qualitative Report
Qualitative Report SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
148
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信