Comparative Evaluation of Midventral and Flank Laparotomy Approaches in Goat.

Journal of veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-24 DOI:10.1155/2014/920191
A A Abubakar, R A Andeshi, A S Yakubu, F M Lawal, U Adamu
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Midventral and Flank Laparotomy Approaches in Goat.","authors":"A A Abubakar,&nbsp;R A Andeshi,&nbsp;A S Yakubu,&nbsp;F M Lawal,&nbsp;U Adamu","doi":"10.1155/2014/920191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to compare two laparotomy approaches (flank and midventral). Ten (n = 10) apparently healthy goats of different breeds and sex, average age of 12 ± 2.1 months, and average weight of 13.4 ± 2 kg were used for the investigation. The goats were randomly divided into flank and midventral groups, each group comprising five goats (n = 5). Standard aseptic laparotomy was performed under lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia with mild sedation. Postsurgical wound score showed significant difference (P < 0.05) in erythema at 18-24 hours and 10-14 days after surgery between the two approaches; significant difference of dehiscence between the two groups was also recorded at 10-14 days after surgery. Total white blood cells (WBC) and lymphocytes counts were significantly different (P < 0.05) at the first and second week after surgery. There was significant difference of platelets critical value and platelets dimension width at the first and second week after surgery. Significant difference of packed cells volume between the two approaches was also recorded one week after surgery. It was concluded that midventral laparotomy approach can be conveniently and safely performed under aseptic precautions without fear of intra- and postoperative clinical problems. </p>","PeriodicalId":91135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine","volume":"2014 ","pages":"920191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/920191","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/920191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare two laparotomy approaches (flank and midventral). Ten (n = 10) apparently healthy goats of different breeds and sex, average age of 12 ± 2.1 months, and average weight of 13.4 ± 2 kg were used for the investigation. The goats were randomly divided into flank and midventral groups, each group comprising five goats (n = 5). Standard aseptic laparotomy was performed under lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia with mild sedation. Postsurgical wound score showed significant difference (P < 0.05) in erythema at 18-24 hours and 10-14 days after surgery between the two approaches; significant difference of dehiscence between the two groups was also recorded at 10-14 days after surgery. Total white blood cells (WBC) and lymphocytes counts were significantly different (P < 0.05) at the first and second week after surgery. There was significant difference of platelets critical value and platelets dimension width at the first and second week after surgery. Significant difference of packed cells volume between the two approaches was also recorded one week after surgery. It was concluded that midventral laparotomy approach can be conveniently and safely performed under aseptic precautions without fear of intra- and postoperative clinical problems.

Abstract Image

山羊中腹侧剖腹入路的比较评价。
本研究的目的是比较两种剖腹手术入路(腹侧和中腹侧)。选取10只不同品种、性别、平均年龄为12±2.1月龄、平均体重为13.4±2 kg的健康山羊(n = 10)进行调查。将山羊随机分为腹侧组和中腹侧组,每组5只(n = 5)。在腰骶部硬膜外麻醉下进行标准无菌开腹手术,轻度镇静。两种入路术后18 ~ 24 h、10 ~ 14 d红斑评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);术后10 ~ 14天,两组间的裂裂情况也有显著性差异。术后第1周、第2周两组总白细胞(WBC)、淋巴细胞计数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后第1周和第2周血小板临界值和血小板尺寸宽度差异有统计学意义。术后1周,两种入路的填充细胞体积也有显著差异。结论:在无菌注意事项下,腹中剖腹入路操作方便、安全,无需担心手术中及术后出现临床问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信