In-hospital clinical outcomes of elderly patients (≥60 years) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-07-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Ya-Min Su, Xing-Xing Cai, Hai-Hua Geng, Hong-Zhuan Sheng, Meng-Kan Fan, Min Pan
{"title":"In-hospital clinical outcomes of elderly patients (≥60 years) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Ya-Min Su,&nbsp;Xing-Xing Cai,&nbsp;Hai-Hua Geng,&nbsp;Hong-Zhuan Sheng,&nbsp;Meng-Kan Fan,&nbsp;Min Pan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elderly patients are at high risk of mortality when they present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the clinical outcomes of this sub-group undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) have not been well established, despite recent advances in both devices and techniques. In the present retrospective cohort study from a Chinese single center, we assessed the clinical outcomes and predictors of mortality in elderly patients (≥60 years) underwent with PPCI. The primary endpoints were immediate angiographic success and in-hospital procedural success. The secondary endpoints were all-cause death in hospital. Between January 2011 and December 2013, a total of 184 consecutive patients with acute STEMI underwent PPCI were enrolled. 116 (63.04%) patients were in the elderly group. Despite the difference in lesion complexity between groups, the immediate angiographic success rate was similar (93.97% in the elderly group, and 94.12% in the non-elderly group, P=0.966). The procedural success rate were not significantly different between the two groups (90.52% in the elderly group, and 94.12% in the non-elderly group, P=0.389). However, in-hospital mortality was statistically higher in elderly group than in the non-elderly group (8.62% Vs 1.47%, P=0.048). The major causes of death were cardiac shock and malignant arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation). Our results indicate that PPCI in the elderly is feasible and has a high likelihood of immediate angiographic and procedural success. </p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565314/pdf/ijcem0008-11244.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elderly patients are at high risk of mortality when they present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the clinical outcomes of this sub-group undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) have not been well established, despite recent advances in both devices and techniques. In the present retrospective cohort study from a Chinese single center, we assessed the clinical outcomes and predictors of mortality in elderly patients (≥60 years) underwent with PPCI. The primary endpoints were immediate angiographic success and in-hospital procedural success. The secondary endpoints were all-cause death in hospital. Between January 2011 and December 2013, a total of 184 consecutive patients with acute STEMI underwent PPCI were enrolled. 116 (63.04%) patients were in the elderly group. Despite the difference in lesion complexity between groups, the immediate angiographic success rate was similar (93.97% in the elderly group, and 94.12% in the non-elderly group, P=0.966). The procedural success rate were not significantly different between the two groups (90.52% in the elderly group, and 94.12% in the non-elderly group, P=0.389). However, in-hospital mortality was statistically higher in elderly group than in the non-elderly group (8.62% Vs 1.47%, P=0.048). The major causes of death were cardiac shock and malignant arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation). Our results indicate that PPCI in the elderly is feasible and has a high likelihood of immediate angiographic and procedural success.

老年患者(≥60岁)初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院临床结果
老年患者st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的死亡风险较高。然而,尽管最近设备和技术都取得了进展,但该亚组接受原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的临床结果尚未得到很好的确定。在目前来自中国单中心的回顾性队列研究中,我们评估了接受PPCI的老年患者(≥60岁)的临床结局和死亡率预测因素。主要终点为即时血管造影成功和院内手术成功。次要终点为院内全因死亡。2011年1月至2013年12月,共有184例急性STEMI患者连续接受PPCI。老年组116例(63.04%)。尽管两组间病变复杂程度不同,但即刻血管造影成功率相似(老年组93.97%,非老年组94.12%,P=0.966)。两组手术成功率差异无统计学意义(老年组90.52%,非老年组94.12%,P=0.389)。老年组住院死亡率高于非老年组(8.62% Vs 1.47%, P=0.048)。死亡的主要原因是心源性休克和恶性心律失常(室性心动过速和纤颤)。我们的结果表明,老年人PPCI是可行的,并且有很高的可能性立即血管造影和手术成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信