Motor Vehicle Crashes, Medical Outcomes, and Hospital Charges Among Children Aged 1-12 Years - Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System, 11 States, 2005-2008.

IF 37.3 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erin K Sauber-Schatz, Andrea M Thomas, Lawrence J Cook
{"title":"Motor Vehicle Crashes, Medical Outcomes, and Hospital Charges Among Children Aged 1-12 Years - Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System, 11 States, 2005-2008.","authors":"Erin K Sauber-Schatz,&nbsp;Andrea M Thomas,&nbsp;Lawrence J Cook","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.ss6408a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death among children. Age- and size-appropriate restraint use is an effective way to prevent motor vehicle-related injuries and deaths. However, children are not always properly restrained while riding in a motor vehicle, and some are not restrained at all, which increases their risk for injury and death in a crash.</p><p><strong>Reporting period: </strong>2005-2008.</p><p><strong>Description of the system: </strong>The Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) is a multistate program facilitated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to probabilistically link police crash reports and hospital databases for traffic safety analyses. Eleven participating states (Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, and Utah) submitted data to CODES during the reporting period. Descriptive analysis was used to describe drivers and child passengers involved in motor vehicle crashes and to summarize crash and medical outcomes. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to compare a child passenger's likelihood of sustaining specific types of injuries by restraint status (optimal, suboptimal, or unrestrained) and seating location (front or back seat). Because of data constraints, optimal restraint use was defined as a car seat or booster seat use for children aged 1-7 years and seat belt use for children aged 8-12 years. Suboptimal restraint use was defined as seat belt use for children aged 1-7 years. Unrestrained was defined as no use of car seat, booster seat, or seat belt for children aged 1-12 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimal restraint use in the back seat declined with child's age (1 year: 95.9%, 5 years: 95.4%, 7 years: 94.7%, 8 years: 77.4%, 10 years: 67.5%, 12 years: 54.7%). Child restraint use was associated with driver restraint use; 41.3% of children riding with unrestrained drivers also were unrestrained compared with 2.2% of children riding with restrained drivers. Child restraint use also was associated with impaired driving due to alcohol or drug use; 16.4% children riding with drivers suspected of alcohol or drug use were unrestrained compared with 2.9% of children riding with drivers not suspected of such use. Optimally restrained and suboptimally restrained children were less likely to sustain a traumatic brain injury than unrestrained children. The 90th percentile hospital charges for children aged 4-7 years who were in motor vehicle crashes were $1,630.00 and $1,958.00 for those optimally restrained in a back seat and front seat, respectively; $2,035.91 and $3,696.00 for those suboptimally restrained in a back seat and front seat, respectively; and $9,956.60 and $11,143.85 for those unrestrained in a back seat and front seat, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Proper car seat, booster seat, and seat belt use among children in the back seat prevents injuries and deaths, as well as averts hospital charges. However, the number, severity, and cost of injuries among children in crashes who were not optimally restrained or who were seated in a front seat indicates the need for improvements in proper use of age- and size-appropriate car seats, booster seats, and seat belts in the back seat.</p><p><strong>Public health actions: </strong>Effective interventions for increasing proper child restraint use could be universally implemented by states and communities to prevent motor vehicle-related injuries among children and their resulting costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48549,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","volume":"64 8","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":37.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Surveillance Summaries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6408a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Problem: Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death among children. Age- and size-appropriate restraint use is an effective way to prevent motor vehicle-related injuries and deaths. However, children are not always properly restrained while riding in a motor vehicle, and some are not restrained at all, which increases their risk for injury and death in a crash.

Reporting period: 2005-2008.

Description of the system: The Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) is a multistate program facilitated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to probabilistically link police crash reports and hospital databases for traffic safety analyses. Eleven participating states (Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, and Utah) submitted data to CODES during the reporting period. Descriptive analysis was used to describe drivers and child passengers involved in motor vehicle crashes and to summarize crash and medical outcomes. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to compare a child passenger's likelihood of sustaining specific types of injuries by restraint status (optimal, suboptimal, or unrestrained) and seating location (front or back seat). Because of data constraints, optimal restraint use was defined as a car seat or booster seat use for children aged 1-7 years and seat belt use for children aged 8-12 years. Suboptimal restraint use was defined as seat belt use for children aged 1-7 years. Unrestrained was defined as no use of car seat, booster seat, or seat belt for children aged 1-12 years.

Results: Optimal restraint use in the back seat declined with child's age (1 year: 95.9%, 5 years: 95.4%, 7 years: 94.7%, 8 years: 77.4%, 10 years: 67.5%, 12 years: 54.7%). Child restraint use was associated with driver restraint use; 41.3% of children riding with unrestrained drivers also were unrestrained compared with 2.2% of children riding with restrained drivers. Child restraint use also was associated with impaired driving due to alcohol or drug use; 16.4% children riding with drivers suspected of alcohol or drug use were unrestrained compared with 2.9% of children riding with drivers not suspected of such use. Optimally restrained and suboptimally restrained children were less likely to sustain a traumatic brain injury than unrestrained children. The 90th percentile hospital charges for children aged 4-7 years who were in motor vehicle crashes were $1,630.00 and $1,958.00 for those optimally restrained in a back seat and front seat, respectively; $2,035.91 and $3,696.00 for those suboptimally restrained in a back seat and front seat, respectively; and $9,956.60 and $11,143.85 for those unrestrained in a back seat and front seat, respectively.

Interpretation: Proper car seat, booster seat, and seat belt use among children in the back seat prevents injuries and deaths, as well as averts hospital charges. However, the number, severity, and cost of injuries among children in crashes who were not optimally restrained or who were seated in a front seat indicates the need for improvements in proper use of age- and size-appropriate car seats, booster seats, and seat belts in the back seat.

Public health actions: Effective interventions for increasing proper child restraint use could be universally implemented by states and communities to prevent motor vehicle-related injuries among children and their resulting costs.

1-12岁儿童的机动车碰撞、医疗结果和医院收费——碰撞结果数据评估系统,11个州,2005-2008。
问题:机动车碰撞是儿童死亡的主要原因。使用与年龄和尺寸相适应的约束装置是预防与机动车辆有关的伤害和死亡的有效方法。然而,儿童在乘坐机动车辆时并不总是受到适当的约束,有些儿童根本没有受到约束,这增加了他们在车祸中受伤和死亡的风险。报告期间:2005-2008年。系统描述:碰撞结果数据评估系统(CODES)是由美国国家公路交通安全管理局(nhtsa)推动的一个多州项目,用于将警方碰撞报告和医院数据库概率地联系起来,以进行交通安全分析。11个参与州(康涅狄格州、佐治亚州、肯塔基州、马里兰州、明尼苏达州、密苏里州、内布拉斯加州、纽约州、俄亥俄州、南卡罗来纳州和犹他州)在报告所述期间向法典提交了数据。描述性分析用于描述涉及机动车辆碰撞的驾驶员和儿童乘客,并总结碰撞和医疗结果。比值比和95%置信区间用于比较儿童乘客因约束状态(最佳、次优或不受约束)和座位位置(前排或后排)而遭受特定类型伤害的可能性。由于数据限制,最佳约束使用被定义为1-7岁儿童使用汽车座椅或增高座椅,8-12岁儿童使用安全带。次优约束使用被定义为1-7岁儿童使用安全带。无约束的定义是1-12岁的儿童不使用汽车座椅、增高座椅或安全带。结果:最佳后座约束使用随儿童年龄的增长呈下降趋势(1岁:95.9%,5岁:95.4%,7岁:94.7%,8岁:77.4%,10岁:67.5%,12岁:54.7%)。儿童约束使用与驾驶员约束使用相关;驾驶不系安全带的儿童中有41.3%未系安全带,而驾驶系安全带的儿童中有2.2%未系安全带。使用儿童约束也与因饮酒或吸毒而导致的驾驶障碍有关;16.4%的儿童与涉嫌饮酒或吸毒的司机一起乘车时不受约束,相比之下,与未涉嫌饮酒或吸毒的司机一起乘车的儿童中,这一比例为2.9%。最佳约束和次最佳约束的儿童比未约束的儿童更不容易遭受创伤性脑损伤。发生机动车辆碰撞的4-7岁儿童的第90百分位医院收费分别为1,630.00美元和1,958.00美元,这些儿童最好坐在后座和前排座位上;后座和前座限制不佳者分别罚款2,035.91美元和3,696.00美元;后排和前座不系安全带的分别为9,956.60美元和11143.85美元。解释:后排儿童正确使用汽车座椅、增高座椅和安全带可以防止受伤和死亡,并避免住院费用。然而,碰撞中没有得到最佳约束或坐在前座的儿童受伤的数量、严重程度和成本表明,需要改进正确使用适合年龄和尺寸的汽车座椅、增高座椅和后座安全带。公共卫生行动:各州和社区可以普遍实施有效的干预措施,增加适当使用儿童约束装置,以防止儿童中与机动车有关的伤害及其造成的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries
Mmwr Surveillance Summaries PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
60.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Series, produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is commonly referred to as "the voice of CDC." Serving as the primary outlet for timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and practical public health information and recommendations, the MMWR is a crucial publication. Its readership primarily includes physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists, scientists, researchers, educators, and laboratorians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信