Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and their Role in Osteoporosis Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.

Patricia Khashayar, Hamidreza Aghaei Meybodi, Ghassem Amoabediny, Bagher Larijani
{"title":"Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and their Role in Osteoporosis Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Patricia Khashayar,&nbsp;Hamidreza Aghaei Meybodi,&nbsp;Ghassem Amoabediny,&nbsp;Bagher Larijani","doi":"10.2174/1872214809666150806105433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoporosis diagnosis, which is nowadays generally made based on bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, suffers from certain limitations. Thus it is believed that bone turnover markers (BTMs) can help improve osteoporosis detection. The shifting interest toward this topic made us perform a review to gather information on existing markers and their role in osteoporosis diagnosis. Based on the results, in this review, a list of existing markers and some of their characteristics is provided. Moreover, a brief explanation of different types of variability met while using these markers is also described. Finally some of the patents provided for the diagnosis of these markers are presented. While the use of BTMs in osteoporosis diagnosis has certain advantages over BMD and clinical risk assessment tools, more studies are needed before they can be used as a separate tool in this regard. It could be concluded that despite the fact that BTMs are better than BMD not only in monitoring treatment but also in identifying those at-risk, the diagnostic value of BTMs in predicting osteoporosis is low, and thus a model is needed to assess several BTMs at the same time with higher accuracy and lower variability to overcome this limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":89474,"journal":{"name":"Recent patents on endocrine, metabolic & immune drug discovery","volume":"9 2","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent patents on endocrine, metabolic & immune drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1872214809666150806105433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Osteoporosis diagnosis, which is nowadays generally made based on bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, suffers from certain limitations. Thus it is believed that bone turnover markers (BTMs) can help improve osteoporosis detection. The shifting interest toward this topic made us perform a review to gather information on existing markers and their role in osteoporosis diagnosis. Based on the results, in this review, a list of existing markers and some of their characteristics is provided. Moreover, a brief explanation of different types of variability met while using these markers is also described. Finally some of the patents provided for the diagnosis of these markers are presented. While the use of BTMs in osteoporosis diagnosis has certain advantages over BMD and clinical risk assessment tools, more studies are needed before they can be used as a separate tool in this regard. It could be concluded that despite the fact that BTMs are better than BMD not only in monitoring treatment but also in identifying those at-risk, the diagnostic value of BTMs in predicting osteoporosis is low, and thus a model is needed to assess several BTMs at the same time with higher accuracy and lower variability to overcome this limitation.

骨转换生化标志物及其在骨质疏松症诊断中的作用:综述。
骨质疏松症的诊断,目前一般是基于骨矿物质密度(BMD)的测量,有一定的局限性。因此,我们认为骨转换标志物(BTMs)有助于提高骨质疏松症的检测。对这一主题的兴趣转变使我们进行了回顾,以收集现有标志物及其在骨质疏松症诊断中的作用的信息。在此基础上,本文综述了现有的标记物及其一些特征。此外,还简要说明了使用这些标记时遇到的不同类型的变异性。最后介绍了为这些标记物的诊断提供的一些专利。虽然BTMs在骨质疏松症诊断中比BMD和临床风险评估工具有一定的优势,但在将其作为单独的工具使用之前,还需要进行更多的研究。由此可见,尽管BTMs在监测治疗和识别高危人群方面均优于BMD,但BTMs对骨质疏松的诊断价值较低,因此需要一种能够同时评估多个BTMs的模型,具有更高的准确性和更低的变异性,以克服这一局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信