Day to Day Variability and Reliability of Blood Oxidative Stress Markers within a Four-Week Period in Healthy Young Men.

Journal of biomarkers Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-10-15 DOI:10.1155/2014/248313
A H Goldfarb, R S Garten, J Waller, J D Labban
{"title":"Day to Day Variability and Reliability of Blood Oxidative Stress Markers within a Four-Week Period in Healthy Young Men.","authors":"A H Goldfarb,&nbsp;R S Garten,&nbsp;J Waller,&nbsp;J D Labban","doi":"10.1155/2014/248313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to determine the day to day variability and reliability of several blood oxidative stress markers at rest in a healthy young cohort over a four-week period. Twelve apparently healthy resistance trained males (24.6 ± 3.0 yrs) were tested over 7 visits within 4 weeks with at least 72 hrs between visits at the same time of day. Subjects rested 30 minutes prior to blood being obtained by vacutainer. Results. The highest IntraClass correlations (ICC's) were obtained for protein carbonyls (PC) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) (PC = 0.785 and ORAC = 0.780). Cronbach's α reliability score for PC was 0.967 and for ORAC was 0.961. The ICC's for GSH, GSSG, and the GSSG/TGH ratio ICC were 0.600, 0.573, and 0.570, respectively, with Cronbach's α being 0.913, 0.904, and 0.903, respectively. Xanthine oxidase ICC was 0.163 and Cronbach's α was 0.538. Conclusions. PC and ORAC demonstrated good to excellent reliability while glutathione factors had poor to excellent reliability. Xanthine oxidase showed poor reliability and high variability. These results suggest that the PC and ORAC markers were the most stable and reliable oxidative stress markers in blood and that daily changes across visits should be considered when interpreting resting blood oxidative stress markers. </p>","PeriodicalId":91105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomarkers","volume":"2014 ","pages":"248313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/248313","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/248313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the day to day variability and reliability of several blood oxidative stress markers at rest in a healthy young cohort over a four-week period. Twelve apparently healthy resistance trained males (24.6 ± 3.0 yrs) were tested over 7 visits within 4 weeks with at least 72 hrs between visits at the same time of day. Subjects rested 30 minutes prior to blood being obtained by vacutainer. Results. The highest IntraClass correlations (ICC's) were obtained for protein carbonyls (PC) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) (PC = 0.785 and ORAC = 0.780). Cronbach's α reliability score for PC was 0.967 and for ORAC was 0.961. The ICC's for GSH, GSSG, and the GSSG/TGH ratio ICC were 0.600, 0.573, and 0.570, respectively, with Cronbach's α being 0.913, 0.904, and 0.903, respectively. Xanthine oxidase ICC was 0.163 and Cronbach's α was 0.538. Conclusions. PC and ORAC demonstrated good to excellent reliability while glutathione factors had poor to excellent reliability. Xanthine oxidase showed poor reliability and high variability. These results suggest that the PC and ORAC markers were the most stable and reliable oxidative stress markers in blood and that daily changes across visits should be considered when interpreting resting blood oxidative stress markers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

健康青年男性4周内血液氧化应激标志物的日常变异性和可靠性
本研究旨在确定健康年轻队列在四周内休息时几种血液氧化应激标志物的日常变异性和可靠性。对12例(24.6±3.0岁)经抗阻训练的健康男性进行4周内7次访视,每次访视间隔不少于72小时。受试者在抽真空取血前休息30分钟。结果。蛋白质羰基(PC)与氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)的类内相关性(ICC)最高(PC = 0.785, ORAC = 0.780)。PC的Cronbach′s α信度评分为0.967,ORAC的Cronbach′s α信度评分为0.961。GSH、GSSG和GSSG/TGH比值ICC分别为0.600、0.573和0.570,Cronbach’s α分别为0.913、0.904和0.903。黄嘌呤氧化酶ICC为0.163,Cronbach’s α为0.538。结论。PC和ORAC的可靠性从良好到优异,而谷胱甘肽因子的可靠性从差到优异。黄嘌呤氧化酶可靠性差,变异性大。这些结果表明,PC和ORAC标记物是血液中最稳定和可靠的氧化应激标记物,在解释静息血液氧化应激标记物时,应考虑来访期间的日常变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信