Additional Value of Diffusion-weighted MRI to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatic MRI for the Detection of Liver Metastasis: the Difference Depending on the Experience of the Radiologists.

Q4 Medicine
Wataru Fukumoto, Yuko Nakamura, Toru Higaki, Fuminari Tatsugami, Makoto Iida, Kazuo Awai
{"title":"Additional Value of Diffusion-weighted MRI to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatic MRI for the Detection of Liver Metastasis: the Difference Depending on the Experience of the Radiologists.","authors":"Wataru Fukumoto,&nbsp;Yuko Nakamura,&nbsp;Toru Higaki,&nbsp;Fuminari Tatsugami,&nbsp;Makoto Iida,&nbsp;Kazuo Awai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study was to investigate whether adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) improved the detection of liver metastasis in radiology resident and board-certified radiologist groups. It was approved by our institutional review board. We selected 18 patients with 35 liver metastases and 12 patients without liver tumors. Five board-certified radiologists and 5 radiology residents participated in the observer performance study. Each observer first interpreted T1- and T2-weighted-, plain-, arterial phase-, and hepatobiliary phase images and specified the location of the liver metastases. The software subsequently displayed the DWI images simultaneously and all participants repeated the reading. We used Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis to compare the observer performance in detecting liver metastases. The mean values for the area under the curve (AUC) for EOB-MRI without and with DWI were 0.78 ± 0.13 [standard deviation: SD] and 0.87 ± 0.09, respectively, for the radiology residents, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.045). For the board- certified radiologists these values were 0.92 ± 0.02 and 0.96 ± 0.01, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.092). EOB-MRI with DWI significantly improved the performance of radiology residents in the identification of liver metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12860,"journal":{"name":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","volume":"64 1-2","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study was to investigate whether adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) improved the detection of liver metastasis in radiology resident and board-certified radiologist groups. It was approved by our institutional review board. We selected 18 patients with 35 liver metastases and 12 patients without liver tumors. Five board-certified radiologists and 5 radiology residents participated in the observer performance study. Each observer first interpreted T1- and T2-weighted-, plain-, arterial phase-, and hepatobiliary phase images and specified the location of the liver metastases. The software subsequently displayed the DWI images simultaneously and all participants repeated the reading. We used Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis to compare the observer performance in detecting liver metastases. The mean values for the area under the curve (AUC) for EOB-MRI without and with DWI were 0.78 ± 0.13 [standard deviation: SD] and 0.87 ± 0.09, respectively, for the radiology residents, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.045). For the board- certified radiologists these values were 0.92 ± 0.02 and 0.96 ± 0.01, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.092). EOB-MRI with DWI significantly improved the performance of radiology residents in the identification of liver metastases.

弥散加权MRI对gd - eob - dtpa增强肝脏MRI检测肝转移的附加价值:基于放射科医师经验的差异。
本回顾性研究旨在探讨在gd - eob - dtpa增强MRI (EOB-MRI)上添加弥散加权成像(DWI)是否能改善放射科住院医师和委员会认证放射科医师组的肝转移检测。我们的机构审查委员会已经批准了。我们选择了18例35例肝转移患者和12例无肝肿瘤患者。5名委员会认证的放射科医师和5名放射科住院医师参加了观察员表现研究。每个观察者首先解释T1和t2加权、平面、动脉期和肝胆期图像,并指定肝转移的位置。随后,软件同时显示DWI图像,所有参与者重复阅读。我们使用Jackknife替代自由反应受体操作特征(JAFROC)分析来比较观察者在检测肝转移方面的表现。无DWI和有DWI的放射科居民EOB-MRI曲线下面积(AUC)均值分别为0.78±0.13[标准差:SD]和0.87±0.09,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.045)。对于委员会认证放射科医师,这些值分别为0.92±0.02和0.96±0.01,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.092)。EOB-MRI联合DWI显著提高了放射科住院医师鉴别肝转移的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信