Measurement of Saccade Parameters in Relation to Adaptation to Homonymous Hemianopia.

Q3 Medicine
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.272
Claire Howard, Paul Knox, Helen Griffiths, Fiona Rowe
{"title":"Measurement of Saccade Parameters in Relation to Adaptation to Homonymous Hemianopia.","authors":"Claire Howard,&nbsp;Paul Knox,&nbsp;Helen Griffiths,&nbsp;Fiona Rowe","doi":"10.22599/bioj.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report saccade parameters in participants during adaptation to post-stroke homonymous hemianopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective observational case cohort study, adult stroke survivors with new onset homonymous hemianopia were recruited. Using quantitative measurement, saccade parameters were measured and compared between the hemianopic and non-hemianopic sides. Two participants with longitudinal measurements were compared with age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 144 clinical study participants, quantitative saccade measurements were only possible in 14 due to an inability to visualise targets on the hemianopic side in the majority. In 9 of the 14 participants, at four weeks post-stroke, mean (±SD) saccade latency was significantly longer to the hemianopic (328.4 ± 105.9 ms) compared to the non-hemianopic side (234.7 ± SD53.6 ms; <i>t</i> = 4.2, <i>df</i> = 8, <i>p</i> = 0.003). The number of correct saccadic responses out of 50 was significantly lower to the hemianopic side (36.6 ± SD14.1) in comparison to the non-hemianopic side (44.4 ± SD7.5; <i>t</i> = -3.1, <i>df</i> = 8, <i>p</i> = 0.014). In two participants studied over an eight-week time period, saccadic differences to the hemianopic side persisted despite apparent recovery of visual field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As participants with residual visual field loss were unable to perform quantitative assessments, the widespread use of this approach in this setting is limited. However, in those whom measurements were possible, there were statistically significant differences in saccade parameters between hemianopic and non-hemianopic sides that persisted post-visual recovery. Exploration of saccades in relation to adaptation to hemianopia and response to saccadic scanning/search training requires further examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"130-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report saccade parameters in participants during adaptation to post-stroke homonymous hemianopia.

Methods: In a prospective observational case cohort study, adult stroke survivors with new onset homonymous hemianopia were recruited. Using quantitative measurement, saccade parameters were measured and compared between the hemianopic and non-hemianopic sides. Two participants with longitudinal measurements were compared with age-matched controls.

Results: Of 144 clinical study participants, quantitative saccade measurements were only possible in 14 due to an inability to visualise targets on the hemianopic side in the majority. In 9 of the 14 participants, at four weeks post-stroke, mean (±SD) saccade latency was significantly longer to the hemianopic (328.4 ± 105.9 ms) compared to the non-hemianopic side (234.7 ± SD53.6 ms; t = 4.2, df = 8, p = 0.003). The number of correct saccadic responses out of 50 was significantly lower to the hemianopic side (36.6 ± SD14.1) in comparison to the non-hemianopic side (44.4 ± SD7.5; t = -3.1, df = 8, p = 0.014). In two participants studied over an eight-week time period, saccadic differences to the hemianopic side persisted despite apparent recovery of visual field.

Conclusion: As participants with residual visual field loss were unable to perform quantitative assessments, the widespread use of this approach in this setting is limited. However, in those whom measurements were possible, there were statistically significant differences in saccade parameters between hemianopic and non-hemianopic sides that persisted post-visual recovery. Exploration of saccades in relation to adaptation to hemianopia and response to saccadic scanning/search training requires further examination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与同义性偏视适应相关的视跳参数测量。
目的:报告脑卒中后同义性偏视适应过程中参与者的眼跳参数。方法:在一项前瞻性观察病例队列研究中,招募了新发同名性偏盲的成年脑卒中幸存者。采用定量测量方法,测量并比较了半近视侧和非半近视侧的视跳参数。两名纵向测量的参与者与年龄匹配的对照组进行了比较。结果:在144名临床研究参与者中,由于大多数人无法看到偏视侧的目标,只有14人可以进行定量的扫视测量。在14名参与者中,有9名在卒中后4周,平均(±SD)扫视潜伏期(328.4±105.9 ms)比非偏视侧(234.7±SD53.6 ms)明显更长。T = 4.2, df = 8, p = 0.003)。50个斜视侧的正确跳眼反应数(36.6±SD14.1)明显低于非斜视侧(44.4±SD7.5;T = -3.1, df = 8, p = 0.014)。对两名参与者进行了为期八周的研究,尽管视野明显恢复,但与偏视侧的跳眼差异仍然存在。结论:由于残余视野丧失的参与者无法进行定量评估,因此这种方法在这种情况下的广泛使用受到限制。然而,在那些可以测量的患者中,在视力恢复后持续存在的偏视侧和非偏视侧之间的扫视参数有统计学上的显著差异。探究扫视与适应偏视和对扫视扫描/搜索训练的反应之间的关系需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信