Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.

IF 1.2 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.5292

Cristhian Javier Rivera Tapia

{"title":"Assessment in Schizotypy: A Systematic Review Towards Clinical and Personality Models.","authors":"Cristhian Javier Rivera Tapia","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: research carried out regarding the psychological concept of schizotypy responds to a ﬁeld of extensive development since its conceptualization decades ago, which includes schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). However, controversies still persist marked by the diﬃculty of establishing deﬁnitive consensus.Objective: the research purpose aimed to synthesize the empirical evidence involved in the use of various methodologies and tools for understanding schizotypy.Methodology: A systematic review was carried out in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PsycNet. By using the PRISMA guidelines, 65 studies published in the last decade (2010-2020) were discriminated.Results: The synthesis of cumulative knowledge made it possible to deﬁne schizotypy as an integrating multidimensional construct and to identify valid assessment tools in use, in its psychometric, clinical, and personality characterizations.Discussion/conclusions: Clinical implications found in these reports are addressed, as well as notions of the continuum of psychoses, taxonomic, and multidimensional models.","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/20/2011-2084-ijpr-15-01-84.PMC9529290.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: research carried out regarding the psychological concept of schizotypy responds to a ﬁeld of extensive development since its conceptualization decades ago, which includes schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). However, controversies still persist marked by the diﬃculty of establishing deﬁnitive consensus.

Objective: the research purpose aimed to synthesize the empirical evidence involved in the use of various methodologies and tools for understanding schizotypy.

Methodology: A systematic review was carried out in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PsycNet. By using the PRISMA guidelines, 65 studies published in the last decade (2010-2020) were discriminated.

Results: The synthesis of cumulative knowledge made it possible to deﬁne schizotypy as an integrating multidimensional construct and to identify valid assessment tools in use, in its psychometric, clinical, and personality characterizations.

Discussion/conclusions: Clinical implications found in these reports are addressed, as well as notions of the continuum of psychoses, taxonomic, and multidimensional models.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

精神分裂型的评估:对临床和人格模型的系统回顾。

前言:关于精神分裂的心理学概念的研究回应了自其概念化几十年来广泛发展的领域，其中包括精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)和分裂型人格障碍(SPD)。然而，争论仍然存在，其特点是难以达成明确的协商一致意见。目的:本研究旨在综合运用各种方法和工具来理解精神分裂型所涉及的经验证据。方法:对以下数据库进行系统评价:Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、Taylor and Francis、Wiley、Science Direct、Google Scholar和PsycNet。通过使用PRISMA指南，对过去十年(2010-2020年)发表的65项研究进行了区分。结果:累积知识的综合使得将分裂型定义为一个整合的多维结构成为可能，并在其心理测量学、临床和人格特征中确定有效的评估工具。讨论/结论:讨论了在这些报告中发现的临床意义，以及精神病连续体、分类学和多维模型的概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.