Developing a Danish version of the LASSI-L test - reliability and predictive value in patients with mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia due to AD and subjective cognitive decline.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2022.2133076
Asmus Vogel, Anna Elise Bruus, Gunhild Waldemar
{"title":"Developing a Danish version of the LASSI-L test - reliability and predictive value in patients with mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia due to AD and subjective cognitive decline.","authors":"Asmus Vogel, Anna Elise Bruus, Gunhild Waldemar","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2133076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tests measuring proactive semantic interference as The Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), has shown promising diagnostic properties for the diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia. LASSI-L may also be efficient in predicting cognitive decline in at-risk individuals. There is an unmet need to examine the diagnostic properties of the LASSI-L in a Danish context where traditional neuropsychological tests are typically applied when diagnosing possible dementia disorders. To investigate the reliability, convergent validity, and predictive value of the new Danish LASSI-L version in aMCI and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). From a memory clinic we included 17 aMCI patients, 15 patients with mild dementia (AD), 17 patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), and 30 healthy controls. Neuropsychological assessment was applied in all patients, and biomarker analyses were performed for patients with aMCI and mild AD. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. Patients with aMCI and mild dementia differed significantly from healthy controls on all LASSI-L measures. ROC analyses showed a very high AUC value for both patients with aMCI [0.85-0.97] and mild dementia [0.93-0.99]. SCD patients generally did not differ from controls, except for significantly lower scores on one item (Cued Recall A1) LASSI-L had high reliability and promising predictive value in the diagnosis of aMCI and mild AD due to AD. SCD patients diagnosed in a memory clinic did not differ significantly from healthy on the LASSI-L.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2133076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tests measuring proactive semantic interference as The Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), has shown promising diagnostic properties for the diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia. LASSI-L may also be efficient in predicting cognitive decline in at-risk individuals. There is an unmet need to examine the diagnostic properties of the LASSI-L in a Danish context where traditional neuropsychological tests are typically applied when diagnosing possible dementia disorders. To investigate the reliability, convergent validity, and predictive value of the new Danish LASSI-L version in aMCI and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). From a memory clinic we included 17 aMCI patients, 15 patients with mild dementia (AD), 17 patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), and 30 healthy controls. Neuropsychological assessment was applied in all patients, and biomarker analyses were performed for patients with aMCI and mild AD. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. Patients with aMCI and mild dementia differed significantly from healthy controls on all LASSI-L measures. ROC analyses showed a very high AUC value for both patients with aMCI [0.85-0.97] and mild dementia [0.93-0.99]. SCD patients generally did not differ from controls, except for significantly lower scores on one item (Cued Recall A1) LASSI-L had high reliability and promising predictive value in the diagnosis of aMCI and mild AD due to AD. SCD patients diagnosed in a memory clinic did not differ significantly from healthy on the LASSI-L.

开发丹麦语版的 LASSI-L 测试--轻度认知障碍、注意力缺失导致的轻度痴呆和主观认知能力下降患者的可靠性和预测价值。
测量主动语义干扰的测试,如《卢温斯坦-阿斯维多语义干扰和学习量表》(LASSI-L),在诊断轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症方面显示出良好的诊断特性。LASSI-L 还能有效预测高危人群的认知能力下降。丹麦在诊断可能的痴呆症时通常会使用传统的神经心理学测试,因此对 LASSI-L 的诊断特性进行研究的需求尚未得到满足。目的是研究新版丹麦 LASSI-L 在阿尔茨海默病(AD)引起的 aMCI 和轻度痴呆症中的可靠性、收敛有效性和预测价值。在一家记忆诊所中,我们纳入了 17 名 aMCI 患者、15 名轻度痴呆(AD)患者、17 名主观认知能力下降(SCD)患者和 30 名健康对照者。我们对所有患者进行了神经心理学评估,并对 aMCI 和轻度 AD 患者进行了生物标志物分析。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.94。在所有 LASSI-L 测量指标上,aMCI 和轻度痴呆症患者都与健康对照组存在显著差异。ROC 分析显示,aMCI 患者的 AUC 值[0.85-0.97]和轻度痴呆患者的 AUC 值[0.93-0.99]都非常高。LASSI-L 在诊断 aMCI 和轻度 AD 方面具有很高的可靠性和预测价值。在记忆诊所确诊的 SCD 患者与健康人在 LASSI-L 上没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信