Gul Bengi Turk, Aysegul Gunduz, Gunes Kiziltan, Meral Erdemir-Kiziltan
{"title":"[Comparison of long-latency reflex and mixed nerve silent period responses in various hypokinetic movement disorders].","authors":"Gul Bengi Turk, Aysegul Gunduz, Gunes Kiziltan, Meral Erdemir-Kiziltan","doi":"10.18071/isz.75.0333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Long-latency reflex and mixed nerve silent period responses are electrophysiological methods to study the sensorimotor functions of the central nervous system. Here we aimed to study long-latency reflexes and mixed nerve silent period responses in different types of hypokinetic movement disorders in order to find an electrophysiological landmark to distinguish them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 39 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD), 12 patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), 10 patients with corticobasal syndrome (CBS), 5 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and 26 healthy participants. We recorded the segmental reflex, the long-latency reflexes and the mixed nerve silent period responses for each participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C reflex, long-latency reflex-I and long-latency reflex-III responses were not obtained in any patients with PSP. Long-latency reflex amplitude/ F amplitude ratio was significantly lower in patients with IPD and PSP compared to healthy individuals (p=0.036, p=0.006 respectively). The mixed nerve silent period end latencies were significantly longer in IPD, MSA, CBS groups compared to the healthy individuals (p=0.026, p=0.050, p=0.008 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suggest that recording long-latency reflex, particularly C reflex responses may provide promising results in distinction of CBS and MSA from PSP. Prospective studies with clinical findings and brainstem reflexes may offer more information.</p>","PeriodicalId":520642,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati szemle","volume":" ","pages":"333-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati szemle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.75.0333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Long-latency reflex and mixed nerve silent period responses are electrophysiological methods to study the sensorimotor functions of the central nervous system. Here we aimed to study long-latency reflexes and mixed nerve silent period responses in different types of hypokinetic movement disorders in order to find an electrophysiological landmark to distinguish them.
Methods: We included 39 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD), 12 patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), 10 patients with corticobasal syndrome (CBS), 5 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and 26 healthy participants. We recorded the segmental reflex, the long-latency reflexes and the mixed nerve silent period responses for each participant.
Results: C reflex, long-latency reflex-I and long-latency reflex-III responses were not obtained in any patients with PSP. Long-latency reflex amplitude/ F amplitude ratio was significantly lower in patients with IPD and PSP compared to healthy individuals (p=0.036, p=0.006 respectively). The mixed nerve silent period end latencies were significantly longer in IPD, MSA, CBS groups compared to the healthy individuals (p=0.026, p=0.050, p=0.008 respectively).
Conclusion: We suggest that recording long-latency reflex, particularly C reflex responses may provide promising results in distinction of CBS and MSA from PSP. Prospective studies with clinical findings and brainstem reflexes may offer more information.